TORY leadership contender James Cleverly has sparked a cross-Border rift in his party after showing a “fundamental misunderstanding” of how the party “works in Scotland”.
The former home secretary – who us hoping to replace Rishi Sunak next month – fired shots at Tory top dogs when he told Conservative members in Kensington last month that the party got “totally outclassed in the digital realm by Reform” adding that “Scottish Labour is a tighter organisation than Scottish Conservatives", according to The Spectator.
Since he made the comments, a senior Scottish Conservative source has told The Times the remarks “undermine the significant achievements of the Scottish Conservative Campaign Organisation”.
The source said: “After a highly successful General Election, where we challenged the SNP, these remarks undermine the significant achievements of the Scottish Conservative Campaign Organisation (SCCO) over the past year – such as increasing our majority in key seats and securing vital council by-election wins.”
READ MORE: Subscribe to The National for £10 to enjoy fantastic puzzles and perks
They added: “Even more concerning, given that CCHQ [Conservative Campaign Headquarters] and SCCO operate as distinct campaigning bodies, this highlights a fundamental misunderstanding of how our party functions in Scotland."
Cleverly said to members that they must “share my frustration that the London Conservative machine is not firing on all cylinders in a way that [the] Labour London machine is a really well-organised institution” before admitting that “Scottish Labour is a tighter organisation than Scottish Conservatives, Welsh Labour is a tighter organisation than Welsh Conservatives.”
After a poor election for the Conservatives, the leadership contest has not been short of suggestions from candidates for overhauling the party establishment.
Leading contender Robert Jenrick has said he wants to scrap the CCHQ-approved candidates’ list so that any member can stand.
Alongside Jenrick and Cleverley, former business secretary Kemi Badenoch and ex-security minister Tom Tugendhat are running for the leadership position.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel