MORE than 100 children have been pulled into poverty by the two-child cap every day since Labour took office, new research has found.
The report from the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) – published on Monday – found that 10,000 children have been pulled into poverty across the UK by the two-child cap since July 5, equivalent to 109 children each day.
John Dickie, the director of CPAG in Scotland, said the UK Government needs to “step up to the plate” and deliver on its child poverty commitments by abolishing the two-child cap in the Autumn Budget.
He continued: “Scrapping the two-child limit is the most cost-effective way to stop more children being pulled into poverty on [Labour’s] watch.
“We welcome its child poverty taskforce, but the damage grows every day – the two-child limit must be abolished in the upcoming Budget.”
READ MORE: Voters say Keir Starmer 'sleazier' than Rishi Sunak, poll finds
Previous research by CPAG found that scrapping the two-child limit today would instantly pull 300,000 children out of poverty – 15,000 of them in Scotland alone – as well as reducing the depth of poverty for 700,000 more.
Statistics from the Department of Work and Pensions show that one in nine (1.6 million) children in the UK are affected by the two-child cap.
More than half (59%) of families affected by the policy have at least one working parent.
Meanwhile, 62% of affected families have three children, 25% have four and 12% have five or more.
The report comes as new analysis published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) last week found that removing the two-child cap is “the single most cost-effective policy for reducing the number of children living below the poverty line”.
A DWP spokesperson said: “No child should be in poverty – that’s why our new cross-government taskforce is developing an ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty and give children the best start in life.
“Alongside this, we have extended the Household Support Fund to support the most vulnerable with essentials this winter and have committed to reviewing Universal Credit while we deliver on our plan to tackle inequality and make work pay.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel