KEIR Starmer has ruled out a total ban on arms sales to Israel, amid claims such a move could aid efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza.
The Prime Minister said a complete ban would cover arms being used for defensive purposes, adding this would be the “wrong position” for the UK to adopt given Iran’s recent ballistic missile attack on Israel.
The UK Government has previously suspended around 30 arms exports to Israel over concerns they could be used in violations of international humanitarian law in the Gaza conflict.
READ MORE: Gaza ceasefire needed 'more than ever' on October 7 anniversary, says John Swinney
However, it faces calls to go further and ban the sale of parts for deadly F-35 jets made in Britain, which Israel has used in its bombardment of Gaza.
Starmer’s remarks came in response to calls for a total ban from independent MPs Richard Burgon and Zarah Sultana, who both lost the Labour whip in July for backing an SNP motion on welfare policy.
Burgon (below) said the case for peace and protection of human life has “never been more urgent and compelling” as the Commons marked the first anniversary of the October 7 massacre by Hamas in Israel, which triggered wider conflict in the Middle East.
The Leeds East MP said: “An immediate ceasefire is desperately needed to stop all the killing, end the war crimes, free the hostages and get the aid into Gaza.
“But it’s clear Israel’s right-wing political leaders will keep rejecting ceasefires and keep violating international law without stronger international pressure.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf's brother-in-law reveals horrors of working in Gaza hospital
“So to get Israeli leaders to back a ceasefire, don’t we need to see tougher action – including an end to all arms sales, as recent international court rulings demand?”
Starmer replied: “I completely agree that we need an immediate ceasefire and that’s what we’re working with, it’s what the US in particular is leading on.
“I don’t agree with a complete ban on arms sales.
“That would include a ban on arms being used for defensive purposes.
“Looking at the attack only a few days ago by Iran, I think the House will understand my position on this and the position of many across the House.”
Sultana (below), the MP for Coventry South, repeated the call for the immediate release of all hostages and accused Israel of a “genocidal assault” in Gaza, “violence” in the West Bank and an “invasion” of Lebanon.
She asked Starmer if he believes Israel’s right to self-defence “justifies” the death toll in the region, adding: “And will he do what is morally and legally right and end the Government’s complicity in war crimes by banning all arms sales to Israel, including F35 fighter jets, not just 30 licences – yes or no?”
Starmer replied: “No. But it is a really serious point.
READ MORE: How life has changed for people in Gaza, Israel and the West Bank since October 7
“Banning all sales would mean none for defensive purposes.
“None for defensive purposes on the anniversary of October 7 and days after a huge attack by Iran into Israel would be a wrong position for this Government and I will not take it.”
MPs heard more than 41,000 Palestinians have been killed in the last 12 months, with Sir Keir adding tens of thousands have been orphaned and almost two million displaced.
Earlier on Monday, Starmer urged Israel to show the “courage of restraint” as it considered what it would do in retaliation to a missile attack from Iran.
He said: “It is a living nightmare and it must end.
“We stand with all innocent victims in Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and beyond.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel