THE industrial investment Sweden has attracted through introducing zonal energy pricing shows how much the Scottish economy could benefit from a transformation in the UK's market, an Octopus Energy chief has said.
Speaking to The National, Rachel Fletcher – the director of regulation at Octopus Energy – said Sweden had attracted more than €70 billion of industrial investment since making the switch to the zonal model.
Like Scotland, there is an abundance of renewables in the north of Sweden, where low electricity prices are now enticing industry to move to the region.
READ MORE: Scots could get free electricity from zonal pricing, Octopus Energy boss says
Fletcher told The National: “I think there is a strong case [for zonal pricing] for Scottish customers in terms of more access to low or negative electricity periods, but there’s also massive opportunity to attract industry into Scotland.
“Sweden, for example, has got zonal pricing and it’s got a similar situation where the north has got abundant renewables.
“On the back of the very low electricity prices that are now properly reflected in the zonal market, they’ve attracted over €70bn worth of industrial investment.
“If you’re a data centre, if you’re a green steel producer, if you’re a hydrogen producer, there’s so many electricity-intensive users who will hunt around for the cheapest power and go there.”
Fletcher also told The National zonal pricing would give Scotland the “cheapest electricity in Europe” which could, at times, be free to consumers.
She stressed Scots were getting the “raw end of the deal” in the UK’s outdated energy market, which she has insisted could turn into a “national scandal” in the years to come because of wind farms being paid to turn off, or “constrained”.
At the moment, Britain has one national energy price even though at any point in the day the cost of producing electricity differs radically around the country.
It costs money to move electricity from where it is produced to where it is needed. Under the current market, if an offshore wind farm in Scotland produces more electricity than the network can handle it is paid to turn off, or ‘constrained’ and a gas-fired power plant in the south of England is paid to turn on.
READ MORE: GB Energy chief grilled on when company will bring bills down
The constraint costs – which are collected from consumers – are huge and in 2022/23 they amounted to £1.5bn and are projected to rise to £3.7bn by 2030, something Octopus considers a “staggering waste of electricity”.
Zonal pricing would split the UK up into several different geographical zones which each having a different price based on its level of supply and demand. Energy consumers would pay less for electricity if they are based close to electricity projects but more if they are based further away, meaning Scotland – with its abundance of renewables – would benefit enormously.
Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus Energy, said earlier this year zonal pricing would increase demand in regions where energy is cheap. Data centres and heavy industry would move to these regions, which is what is happening in Sweden.
Jackson said in March: “By system reform what we can do is make sure that we’re not paying generators to turn off, we’re actually paying them for the electricity they produce at lower prices than we’ve ever had before and we’re able to use it.”
“If you change the price, you get more demand in the regions it’s cheap. Things like data centres or heavy industries will usually move there.
“This is what they do in Scandinavia and they’ve seen huge success. Scotland, parts of England, Wales, would have some of the cheapest electricity in Europe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel