A LABOUR MSP who defied the party whip to demand the UK Government reverse its “unjust” cut to pensioners’ fuel support payments has spoken out.
Former Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said he had never before defied the party whip to vote with the Scottish Government – but said his support for the universal Winter Fuel Payment was “unyielding”.
He was one of only two Scottish Labour MSPs, the other being Alex Rowley, to vote with the SNP and the Tories for a motion calling on Keir Starmer to reverse the cut on Tuesday.
Party bosses reportedly gave five others permission to skip the vote.
Leonard said: “I voted to keep the winter fuel allowance because for me the principle of providing universal support to our pensioners is unyielding.
READ MORE: Two Labour MSPs rebel as Holyrood votes against UK Winter Fuel Payment cut
“This was the first time I had ever voted with the government against the Labour whip. I did not do it lightly and I do not support the SNP’s position on means testing.
“Giving the winter fuel payment to everyone is the only way to guarantee that everyone who needs it will get it.”
The former Scottish Labour leader (above) said that the oldest pensioners were the poorest and that many of them were women who had been “denied access to occupational pensions and on low basic state pensions”.
He added: “There is no moral case for ending this payment, it is socially unjust, and the economic case does not stack up.
“The policy is wrong and should be reversed.”
READ MORE: How every MSP voted as Holyrood rejected the UK's Winter Fuel Payment cut
Scottish Labour tabled an amendment to the SNP’s motion, calling on the Scottish Government to use the £41 million passed to them from the UK Government’s extension to the Household Support Fund to create a new package of support for poorer pensioners.
The motion, which Leonard backed, also called on the Scottish Government to reverse its decision to axe the Fuel Insecurity Fund, which gave grants for energy bills to households in poverty.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel