THE family of Sheku Bayoh have accused the Scottish Government of “stonewalling” them over calls for it to expand the terms of reference of the inquiry into his death.
They said it is “deeply insulting” that ministers appear to be “ignoring” them and Lord Bracadale after the family asked for the inquiry to be allowed to examine and investigate why the Crown Office did not prosecute police after the incident.
Bayoh, a father-of-two, died after he was restrained by around six police officers who were called to Hayfield Road in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on May 3, 2015.
The inquiry is investigating the circumstances of the 31-year-old’s death and whether race was a factor.
READ MORE: Good Law Project launches legal challenge against Reform UK
In his closing statement, inquiry chairman Lord Bracadale said he hopes Scottish ministers are able to reach a decision on the family’s request for the terms of reference to be extended “as soon as possible”.
The family’s lawyer Aamer Anwar read a statement on their behalf after evidential hearings finished on Wednesday.
He said: “Kate Forbes, as Deputy First Minister, was asked several weeks ago to expand the terms of reference by the chair, to allow this inquiry to examine and investigate why the Crown Office did not prosecute the police officers or Police Scotland.
“For five weeks this inquiry and the family have awaited a response, it is deeply insulting that this Government is deliberately stonewalling not just them but ignoring Lord Bracadale.
“Today to put it bluntly, Kate Forbes was asked at the end of evidence, to hurry up and make a decision by Lord Bracadale. Kate Forbes will also be aware that the leaders of the opposition have also backed the family’s demands.
“It cannot be right that in 2024, the Crown Office, the most powerful institution in our country tasked with protecting us from our guardians of law and order when they abuse the rule of law, are unaccountable themselves.
“Unless those terms are expanded, family after family will continue to be denied justice by an archaic rule, leaving the Crown Office who when they fail in their public duty, can simply cover it up.
“The Bayoh family are deeply grateful to Lord Bracadale and his team for their robust and impartial inquiry, but they now must directly appeal to Kate Forbes to fulfil her Government’s promise to them to deliver the whole truth, and not to be complicit in the final betrayal of justice.”
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry returns to legal career with top Scottish firm
At a press conference after the evidential hearing, Bayoh’s sister Kadi Johnson said: “We have come this far because we want to know why Sheku died and how he died, but if we don’t get there then we, for us we have no closure, so I plead with Kate Forbes to get on with it and get a decision made.”
Since May 2022 the inquiry has held around 120 days of hearings on evidence as well as examining many statements from people who did not give oral evidence.
In his closing statement, Lord Bracadale said: “I am aware that the Scottish ministers have for some time been considering a request by the families of Sheku Bayoh to extend the terms of reference of the inquiry.
“In order to fulfil extended terms of reference the inquiry would require to examine further evidence.
“Having regard to the stage that the inquiry has reached, and the need for the inquiry and all core participants to plan ahead, I would very much hope that the Scottish ministers are able to reach a decision on this issue as soon as possible.”
The next stage of the inquiry will be the closing submissions, with oral submissions due to begin on December 3.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said:
“All participants views must be given full and careful consideration ahead of any decision being taken to extend the Terms of Reference.
"I have initiated the formal process of gathering the views of all key parties on this request, including meeting the Chair of the inquiry on 5 September, in line with the Inquiry Act 2005.
“I wrote to Mr Anwar on 10 September assuring him that the process is underway.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here