LABOUR have not got a lot to be shouting about after their first three months in office. After all, the headline-grabbing things they have done – like cutting the Winter Fuel Payment – haven’t exactly gone down well.
Perhaps that might go some way to explaining why they’ve taken to blowing their own trumpet for things they haven’t done.
Take for example Anas Sarwar, who in August joined the Labour voices parroting how their new UK Government was already “delivering for Scotland” by securing a protected status for Scotch whisky in Brazil.
The problem? That protected status had actually been secured in June, before Labour even took power.
Apparently unperturbed about little things like the truth, Scottish Labour have only gone and done it again.
Neil Bibby, Scottish Labour’s culture spokesperson, said: “This UK Labour Government tax break is blockbuster news for the Scottish film industry which is a vital part of Brand Scotland.”
He added: “This tax break will pay dividends both culturally and economically, inspire the next generation of talent across the country, deliver more great Scottish content, and sustain a world-leading industry here in Scotland and the wider UK.”
Now, it is true that the Labour Government announced those tax breaks today. It is equally true that the Tory government announced them back in March.
READ MORE: Labour fuel payment cut vote rebel speaks out after defying Anas Sarwar
In details published in a policy paper on the UK Government website on March 6, it states: “Films which meet the qualifying criteria for an independent film will be eligible for a higher rate of expenditure credit on their qualifying expenditure.
“The basic rate of credit under Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) is 34% – independent films will receive a rate of 53%.”
Today, the Labour Government announced an eerily similar policy, saying: “Independent film productions costing up to £15 million to benefit from an increased tax relief of 53%.”
One caveat did look suspicious however. The UK Government noted: “Productions qualifying for the relief must have started principal photography on or after 1 April 2024, and only expenditure incurred on or after 1 April 2024 can be claimed.”
April 1 seems an odd date to have chosen if Labour really had done this today – and it wasn’t actually done by the Tories back in March ...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel