A FORMER Scottish Labour leader has given her verdict on the Labour Government’s communication failings in its first 100 days, suggesting Sue Gray’s new post sounding like a representative “coming from a foreign country”.
During Wednesday nights BBC Debate Night held in Perth, host Stephen Jardine asked Kezia Dugdale about Gray’s recent appointment as envoy to the regions and name which came after she was forced to resign as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff amid infighting.
He said: “What about Sue Gray (below), resigns as chief of staff and becomes envoy to the nations and regions. She’s here on Friday meeting in Edinburgh. When you were Scottish Labour leader, would you have welcomed an envoy to the nations and regions coming to Scotland to meet you?”.
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie who was also on the panel agreed, adding: “It is a little bit.”
Dugdale said: “So I don’t think that first word is helpful,” before adding: “I do think it’s really good though to have someone at the heart of the UK Government that’s interested and focused on making devolution work.”
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Nations and regions meeting exposes Labour's priorities
Dugdale, who works at the University of Glasgow’s Centre for Public Policy, recently published a major report on breaking the independence stalemate alongside former Yes Scotland chief Stephen Noon.
When asked if she had sent the recent policy paper to Gray, Dugdale laughed before responding: “I actually haven’t but I will do now Stephen, that’s a great idea.”
READ MORE: SNP MP accuses Labour of 'colonial mindset' over Sue Gray envoy role
During the first question, “Why are Labour not standing up for working people?”, Dugdale suggested communications during Starmer’s first 100 days were one of the key factors in the public “disappointment” and it was an “inevitable result after offering big change … and not seeing that change right away”.
She said: “The combination of the freebies and the winter fuel allowance leaves people feeling really disappointed. That said, if you don’t mind me saying, there are some really great things that Labour have done in the first 100 days that have been eclipsed by all this stuff”.
She listed several things the Labour Government has done including praising their response to the riots in August, the new workers’ rights being introduced and bringing English railways into public ownership.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel