SCOTTISH people were “only too happy” to see Covid lockdowns extended so they did not have to go to work, Boris Johnson has claimed.
In his new book “Unleashed”, the disgraced former prime minister also took aim at Nicola Sturgeon over her handling of the pandemic, claiming she only sought to enact different policies to him for political ends.
He wrote: “The sainted leader of the Scottish National Party had adopted a highly successful strategy for most of the pandemic of always appearing to be slightly more risk-averse than the government in London.
“Since a majority of the British public tended to be on the cautious side, this generally went down well. So Nicola would use her devolved freedoms to keep schools closed, to keep masks on and to keep people locked down for that little bit longer than in England and Wales.”
He wrote: “If we decided, after agonising debate, that it was time for people to go back to work, [Sturgeon] would immediately appear on the TV, lips pursed, brow furrowed, to say that Scotland wasn't ready for this yet; and some Scottish people seemed only too happy to spend a little longer at home at the general expense.”
The former Tory leader further claimed that Sturgeon had “a strategy of gratuitous differentiation”.
He added: “It was deeply frustrating partly because it was confusing for the public, partly because it made me look like a brutal English Tory while she was an unco guid Princess Twinkletoes.”
READ MORE: Laura Kuenssberg 'mistake' questioned as Boris Johnson interview cancelled
Johnson went on to claim: “As things turned out, her Scotland-only measures were probably useless. There is no perceptible difference, at the end of the pandemic, in the overall mortality rate between England and Scotland.
“If she hoped the pandemic would in any way promote the notion of breaking up the UK, well, those hopes were crushed.”
In her review of Johnson’s book for the New Statesman, Sturgeon called out the former Tory leader for critiquing women’s appearance.
She said: “It is often the lot of women in politics to have our physical appearance uncharitably critiqued by men who want to bring us down to size, and Johnson is a master of the ‘art’. When he has a go at me over Covid, it is my supposedly pursed lips and furrowed brow that get the treatment.
“Perhaps he thinks I should have created more of a party atmosphere."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel