Welcome to this week's Branch Office Updates newsletter! Click the linked banner above to subscribe.
AT LABOUR conference a few weeks back, I could already feel a bit of underlying anxiety in Scottish Labour ranks.
The mood was largely celebratory of course. I lost count of the number of times I heard about the 37 Scottish seats they had won at the General Election, going some way in helping secure a stonking Labour majority.
But there were already some concerns that Keir Starmer and the UK Labour top brass weren’t fully aware of or prioritising the 2026 Holyrood election.
READ MORE: YouGov: Keir Starmer has negative approval ratings
After all, as Anas Sarwar said in an interview in February this year – he can’t afford an “unpopular” Labour Government if he is to become Scotland’s next first minister.
“I am really open with Keir and the UK shadow cabinet that I want to and need to be going into a 2026 election in the midterm of a popular Labour government, not an unpopular one,” Sarwar told The New Statesman.
But is Sir Keir listening?
You can safely say that the first 100 days of this new Labour Government haven’t gone fully to plan. The row over freebies for one.
But then there have also been a sequence of policy decisions that have proven unbelievably unpopular – notably cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment and keeping the two-child benefit cap – which have led to an almighty collapse in approval ratings.
The discontent has dribbled into the political arena already – with the party even admitting that the cut to the WFP was to blame for damaging losses to the SNP in two Dundee by-elections.
There are already signs, too, of opposition to the policy within its elected officials too – with two rebel MSPs rebelling against Sarwar in a Holyrood vote this week.
Former Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard (above) and Alex Rowley, who stepped down from the frontbench last month, backed the SNP motion which called for the UK Government to reverse the cut.
I spoke with several Scottish Labour members, too, who expressed frustration at the direction of the party and disappointment as Sarwar’s perceived refusal to “stand up to Starmer” as he previously promised.
“Scottish Labour are definitely not doing enough to fight the Winter Fuel Payment cut and the two child benefit cap,” one member told me.
“Members and Scottish voters who backed Labour have had a bit of a double whammy with lies to be honest. First, we were promised change by Starmer, which hasn’t happened. Then, we were promised a fight by Sarwar which hasn’t happened either.”
They added: “It will almost certainly come back to bite them in 2026 unless something drastically changes.”
Another member cut a more optimistic tone.
“I still think Scotland is behind Labour because they want to see real change from the Conservatives,” they said.
“Even now, our policies are distinct from the Tories despite the comparisons some outlets might want to make.”
But regardless, if the new Labour Government continues in this vein, Sarwar’s chances of becoming first minister will continue to take a hit.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel