THERE are calls for the Scottish Government to “reset” its climate ambitions after MSPs voted in favour of watering down targets a minister admitted were “unrealistic”.
The Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill passed at stage one following a debate in Holyrood.
In the vote on Thursday, 94 backed the general principles of the bill, none voted against and seven abstained.
The legislation was introduced after ministers announced they had abandoned a target of reducing emissions by 75% by 2030.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson claims 'Union is safe' thanks to Alister Jack
The Government accepted in April the goal was “out of reach”, but because it was included in climate change legislation, ministers were forced to bring forward a bill to amend it.
Scottish Greens MSP Mark Ruskell said the bill “must result in a reset in climate ambitions”.
He told MSPs: “We cannot ignore the need for the government to take unprecedented action to tackle the climate emergency.
“Action is what Greens need to see if we are to give this bill our full support.”
Scotland’s Net Zero and Energy Secretary Gillian Martin said while her government had been “laudable” in its climate goals, she admitted they were “unrealistic”.
However, she said she remained committed to the ultimate goal of reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2045.
As well as amending the 2019 legislation, the bill will see Scotland move to a five-year cycle of carbon budgeting, instead of aiming to reduce emissions by a certain proportion by a set time, while still retaining the ultimate target of reaching net zero by 2045.
“These budgets, based on the advice of experts, represent our best path towards net zero,” Martin said.
She said the Scottish Government “continues to lead the way in the journey to net zero” and added that “resolute action on net zero will not change”.
She added: “Scotland continues to be at the forefront of climate action. I truly believe the people of Scotland share a drive to achieve net zero ambitions and protect future generations.”
READ MORE: Sue Gray's new job in doubt as she pulls out of major meeting
Scottish Labour said the scrapping of the target follows years of failure on the environment.
Speaking during a Holyrood debate, Sarah Boyack said: “We are hugely disappointed that we have ended up needing this Bill.
“We put it down to the fact that we have had poor environmental leadership over 17 years of the SNP’s time in government which has meant we have lost the opportunity to be a world leader on climate change.
“Our Parliament’s targets were ambitious and they were celebrated for being bold but the action by the Scottish Government has not matched the ambitions in both the climate acts.”
The Scottish Government has missed eight of the last 12 annual targets to lower emissions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel