PRESSURE is mounting on the UK Government to sack an advisor due to conflicts of interest highlighted by campaigners.
The Good Law Project and Compassion in Politics have handed in a dossier of evidence to the Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper which details controversial advisor Lord Walney’s commercial interests, which they believe constitute a conflict of interest.
Lord Walney was appointed to the unpaid role of Independent Adviser on Political Violence and Disruption by Boris Johnson.
However, he has remained in place since Keir Starmer came to power — although reports suggest that his position is under review.
READ MORE: John Swinney ‘very optimistic’ about 2026 after 100 days of Starmer
Walney is the author of the ‘Protecting our Democracy from Coercion’ report, which called for the UK Government to bring in new restrictions on protests.
However, the dossier states that Walney has commercial interests in organisations whose clients have been targeted by climate change and pro-Palestine protesters — the very groups Walney’s report on clamping down protests would target.
Alongside his government role, Lord Walney is a paid advisor to the lobbying firm, Rud Pedersen Public Affairs, whose clients include fossil fuel companies.
Lord Walney is also the chair of the Purpose Business Coalition, an organisation run by the lobbying firm Crowne Associates, which has had oil giant, BP, and the arms company, Leonardo, as its clients.
“Over the last few years, we have seen an alarming and accelerated attack on protest rights in this country. Our new government should be taking urgent steps to put this right.
“Lord Walney’s influential position as a so-called ‘independent’ government adviser has been utterly compromised by his conflicts of interest.
“The current review of his appointment is the perfect opportunity for the Home Office to act on the evidence we have provided.
Jennifer Nadel, co-director of the cross-party think tank, Compassion in Politics, added: "It is vital for democracy that politicians act with transparency and impartiality. With public faith in the political process at an all time low, any breach of those standards must be dealt with swiftly.
READ MORE: Fury as Keir Starmer appoints another peer to fill Government post
"The evidence we have submitted to the Home Secretary and Prime Minister shows that Lord Walney has abused his position of authority - lobbying for restrictions on the right to protest while being paid by firms who stand to benefit from those restrictions being introduced.
"The prime minister has made restoring trust, decency, and standards in politics a major priority. We urge him to put that promise into action by removing Lord Walney from his position and detailing how his government will prevent such abuses of power from reoccurring in future.”
The campaign groups have also submitted a separate complaint to the House of Lords Commissioners for Standards concerning Lord Walney’s failure to declare his role as chair of the Purpose Defence Coalition — a linked group which includes defence-related organisations.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel