AN MSP expelled from the SNP over his comments about the Israeli siege of Gaza has claimed that party officials have decided there is an ongoing genocide "no matter what the evidence is".
On Monday, Glasgow Shettleston MSP John Mason told the BBC he does not understand what party policy he contradicted in arguing against allegations that the Israeli government has genocidal intent in Gaza.
Mason attracted fury from members of his own party in August when he posted on social media: “If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they would have killed ten times as many.”
He was reacting to former SNP MSP Sandra White, who had said: “We know what Israelis hope to achieve they are already committing genocide in Gaza,” adding that “innocent children are being massacred”.
In a post on X on Sunday, Mason revealed he had been expelled by the party over his comments and was “very disappointed”.
READ MORE: David Pratt: Iran’s nuclear sites – a red line Israel won’t cross?
He told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Monday: “I have the right to appeal so I need to consider whether I’m going to do that or not.”
He said although the party has “put (him) out” they are “still very much part of my heart”.
He added: “I will certainly not be joining any other political party. At the moment I am an independent MSP, I was elected for five years and I will keep to that promise of serving my constituents for five years.
“It makes no difference to my work locally.”
Mason further said: “I do not think Israel has committed genocide. There’s a war going on, lives have been lost, desperately sadly, as they have been in Ukraine, as they have been in every war.
“There is a difference between war and genocide and to say that every war is genocide, is not the way we use that word.
“When I had the meeting with the committee on Saturday most of the time was spent on a discussion on what is genocide.”
He said he felt those on the committee making the decision had “made up their minds that Israel has committed genocide, no matter what the evidence is, so I didn’t feel there was a lot of sympathy for me in the room”.
He said it “could be argued” that Israel’s actions are “not proportionate”.
He said he had hoped that the SNP would be “tolerant on issues like this” and said he does “not understand what the party policy is that I am disagreeing with”, saying he backs a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
After the decision to remove the whip in August, a party spokesperson said: “To flippantly dismiss the death of more than 40,000 Palestinians is completely unacceptable. There can be no room in the SNP for this kind of intolerance.
“The chief whip has today withdrawn the whip from John Mason MSP with immediate effect, pending internal parliamentary group due process.
READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: UK politicians have given up on wealth redistribution
“The SNP group will now meet to discuss the matter, with a recommendation that the whip be suspended from John Mason for a fixed period of time because of this utterly abhorrent comment.”
The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked a year ago, killing 1200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting around 250.
Around 100 hostages are still held in Gaza but a third are believed to be dead.
Israel’s bombardment and its ground invasion of Gaza have killed more than 42,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, and left much of the territory in ruins.
On Monday, reports said an Israeli air strike had hit a refugee camp at a Gaza hospital, killing at least four people.
Israel says it has killed more than 17,000 fighters.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel