THE SNP’s treatment of former first minister Alex Salmond has been described as “pathetic” and “shameful” by one of the party’s most prominent rebel MSPs.
Salmond – who died after suffering a heart attack on Saturday in North Macedonia – resigned his party membership following allegations of sexual offences and went on to become leader of the Alba Party in 2021.
He would later be cleared in the High Court of all offences and would accuse figures in the Scottish Government and SNP of a plot against him, which was denied.
But Fergus Ewing – a long time friend of Salmond and son of SNP legend Winnie Ewing – likened his party’s treatment of the former leader to that of Joseph Stalin.
READ MORE: Tartan Army to honour 'great patriot' Alex Salmond at Scotland v Portugal match
“Over the past years, the party he transformed and led to victory turned against him and quite literally erased him from their history,” he wrote in the Times.
“They tried to pretend he did not exist. They never talked about him or even uttered his name.
“He made them. They in turn spurned and shunned him. In a way it was comparable to Stalin who, after removing ‘enemies of the state’ would wipe all traces of them from official photographs.
“It was, in the true sense of the word, pathetic and it was shameful.”
Salmond’s death drew tributes from those he had formerly been close to, including his deputy and successor Nicola Sturgeon, who acknowledged the “breakdown” of the relationship between the two, but praised him as “an incredibly significant figure in my life”.
But Ewing attacked what he said was a lack of “contrition” in the tributes.
“In the so-called tributes from some in the leadership over the past few sad says, not one single word of contrition has been uttered for this ugliest of defenestrations,” he wrote.
“In the past three years, it was my privilege to work with Alex on all sorts of matters.
“By far the most important of all was to obtain truth and justice for the way he was the subject of what I believe was a concerted campaign by some of the ‘top’ people in the land.”
He went on to describe a “malevolent and wicked campaign” which, if it had succeeded, he said could have ended with Salmond having “died in a prison cell”.
Ewing concluded that, until “the truth of this scandal is exposed, Scotland as a country is diminished”.
The former first minister had launched a second legal action against the Scottish Government – after a judge ruled the probe into two harassment complaints against him was “tainted with apparent bias” and awarded him more than £500,000 in 2019 – accusing senior figures, including Sturgeon and former permanent secretary Leslie Evans of “misfeasance”.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond's court case against the Scottish Government to continue
According to Alba Party acting leader – and a lifelong friend of Salmond – Kenny MacAskill, the action can still be taken forward by the former first minister’s family, a move which he supported.
While Ewing wrote that he will “continue to devote myself to securing that truth and justice”.
Giving evidence to a Scottish Parliament committee holding an inquiry into the botched harassment complaint investigation, Salmond accused those at the highest echelons of the Scottish Government of a plot against him, something then first minister Sturgeon called “absurd”.
Meanwhile, work to repatriate Salmond’s body continues, with a top aide to the organiser of the conference the former SNP leader was attending when he died saying a “special flight” will return him to Scotland.
Boris Josifovski – who works for former North Macedonian president Gjorge Ivanov – told the Associated Press paperwork was “nearly finished” on Monday and the flight would likely take off from the city of Ohrid in the country’s south west.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel