THE previous government was preparing to sanction two Israeli ministers over comments encouraging blocking aid to Gaza, David Cameron has said.
Cameron told the BBC on Tuesday that he had been “working up” sanctions against Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich and national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir during his final days as foreign secretary.
He described the two men as “extremists” and argued that sanctions would have been a way of putting “pressure” on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to act in line with international law.
READ MORE: Fears Nelson Mandela's grandson blocked from entering UK over stance on Gaza
Cameron said: “When you look at what they say, they have said things like encouraging people to stop aid convoys going into Gaza, they have encouraged extreme settlers in the West Bank with the appalling things they have been carrying out.”
Asked why the sanctions had not been imposed, Cameron said he had been advised the move would have been too “political” during an election.
Smotrich was recently criticised for appearing to suggest it might be “just and moral” to withhold food aid from Gaza, while Ben-Gvir has backed the expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank.
The current Foreign Secretary, David Lammy (below), has also condemned both men but declined to commit to sanctioning them when urged to do so during a Commons debate last month.
He did, however, suggest that sanctions relating to settler violence in the West Bank would be “kept under close review” during this year’s Labour Party conference.
Cameron urged the Government to “look again at the sanctions issue”, arguing that his was a better way of pressuring Netanyahu than suspending arms exports to Israel.
He said: “I thought the Government made a mistake over the arms embargo because, fundamentally, if you are, on the one hand, protecting, helping to protect Israel from a state-on-state attack by Iran, but at the same time you are withholding the export of weapons, that policy makes no sense.”
READ MORE: Labour MPs push their own Government to end arms sales to Israel
Arguing that it was “right to back Israel’s right to self-defence”, he said that support was not “unconditional” and the Government should be prepared to use its sanctions regime against “extremist” ministers “to say this is not good enough and has to stop”.
In February, the Conservative government did sanction four “extremist” Israeli settlers accused of attacking Palestinians in the West Bank.
And on Tuesday, the UK Government announced sanctions on "extremist settlers" in the West Bank, including three outposts and four organisations which Lammy said have supported and perpetrated “heinous abuses of human rights” against Palestinian communities in the occupied territory.
A Foreign Office spokesperson declined to comment on whether it would sanction the two ministers, saying: “The UK strongly condemns settler violence and inciteful remarks such as those made by Israel’s National Security Minister Ben-Gvir, which threaten the status-quo of the Holy Sites in Jerusalem.
“We do not comment on future sanctions designations.”
Downing Street also declined to comment on the possibility of sanctions, but said the Government would “continue to take action to challenge those who undermine a two-state solution”.
Foreign Office minister Anneliese Dodds (above) declined to be drawn on Cameron’s remarks when challenged in the Commons during an urgent question on Gaza and Lebanon.
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Calum Miller said the Government should enact the measures against the two Israeli ministers, saying: “No-one can be left unmoved by the level of human suffering we have seen recently on our screens. We need immediate ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon more than ever.
“Does the minister agree that now is the time to use our sanctions regime against the extremist ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich?”
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf speaks out after 'innocent people burned alive' by Israeli air strike
Miller also called for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to be proscribed.
Dodds said: “(Miller) talked about those who have expressed views which are inflammatory or even worse than that, remarks which are appallingly discriminatory, the UK Government has been wholehearted in its condemnation of those remarks.
“He asked about sanctions specifically, of course the UK will always keep our sanctions regime closely under review, as he would expect, and we will announce any changes to the House.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here