LABOUR are facing calls to return a “blood-stained” £4 million amid reports that it came from a tax-haven firm which stands to profit from Israel’s siege on Gaza.
OpenDemocracy reported that the Cayman Islands-registered Quadrature Capital, a hedge fund with investments in weapons firms and private healthcare, held “$121m worth of shares in a range of arms, tech and logistics firms which have all supported the ongoing military campaign”.
Reports said those firms included those involved in the manufacture of F-35 fighter jets, which Israel has been documented using in Gaza.
READ MORE: Labour's new 'climate envoy' linked with £4m party mega-donor hedge fund
The jets have proven controversial in recent weeks as the UK Government specifically refused to block F-35 parts when it took the decision to suspend 30 of the 350 arms export licences to Israel.
Labour accepted a £4m donation from Quadrature Capital, the sixth largest political donation in British history, just after the General Election was announced. The timing meant it did not have to be declared until after votes had been counted.
MP Zarah Sultana, who was suspended from Labour after voting to scrap the two-child benefit cap, called for the party to hand back the money.
Labour took £4 million from Quadrature Capital, which profits from F-35 jets bombing people in Gaza & Lebanon.
— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) October 16, 2024
Meanwhile, the government refuses to end all arms sales to Israel, including F-35 parts, making it complicit in genocide.
Labour must return this blood-stained money.
“Labour took £4m from Quadrature Capital, which profits from F-35 jets bombing people in Gaza and Lebanon,” she wrote on social media.
“Meanwhile, the [UK} Government refuses to end all arms sales to Israel, including F-35 parts, making it complicit in genocide.
“Labour must return this blood-stained money.”
Israel is still carrying out near-daily strikes across the Gaza Strip more than a year into the war, and has been waging a major ground assault in the north, where it claims militants have regrouped.
Israel launched a total siege of Gaza after Hamas attacked southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing some 1200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting around 250 hostages. Around 100 are still being held inside Gaza, a third of whom are believed to be dead.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf speaks out after 'innocent people burned alive' by Israeli air strike
Israel’s retaliatory offensive has killed over 42,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters but says women and children make up more than half the fatalities.
Around 90% of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million people have been displaced by the war, often multiple times, and large areas of the coastal territory have been completely destroyed.
Israel has ordered the entire remaining population of the northern third of Gaza, estimated at around 400,000 people, to evacuate to the south and has not allowed any food to enter the north since the start of the month.
The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor is seeking an arrest warrant for Israel prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes including the use of starvation as a method of war.
A spokesperson for Quadrature pointed to a statement about the £4m Labour donation on their website, which claims it was “values-based” and not “political”.
They went on: “At any given time Quadrature will have long and short positions across many thousands of different stocks. Quadrature is a fully automated systematic trading firm, with investment decisions directed by computer programmes. We do not make any proactive or discretionary decisions about buying or selling shares on the basis of the underlying nature of the stocks, but rather look to correct shorter-term statistical inefficiencies in the markets in an automated way.
“The idea that Quadrature’s trading is ‘linked to Israel’s war in Gaza’ is non-sensical. Most pension holders in the UK and most index tracker funds also own these stocks.”
The Labour Party was also approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here