KEMI Badenoch has said that she would give JK Rowling a peerage.
The Tory leadership candidate praised the Harry Potter author, saying that they have a shared belief when it comes to trans issues.
The shadow communities secretary and former equalities minister also claimed that anti-trans activists had been “attacked relentlessly by all sorts of oddballs and bad people”.
Then, when asked if she would give Rowling a seat in the House of Lords, Badenoch told Talk TV: “I would. I don’t know whether she would take it, but I certainly would give her a peerage.”
READ MORE: Labour slammed over silence on SNP call to scrap Internal Market Act
Most peers are appointed on the Prime Minister’s advice, although the leaders of opposition parties can technically recommend peers from their parties.
Badenoch’s comments come as her and Tory leadership race rival Robert Jenrick are set to take part in a televised TV debate on GB News tonight (Thursday)..
Badenoch has insisted that despite her lower profile early in the race, she was going to win.
“I think we are going to do this. I am not being complacent,” she told a virtual rally of Tory members held on the platform Teams.
The North West Essex MP added: “I am working hard, I am running a grassroots campaign, not a TV campaign or a media campaign. I am getting out there and I am looking forward to meeting many of you on the campaign trail.”
In a wide-ranging question and answer session with Tory members, she claimed Reform UK and the Lib Dems were “two sides of the same coin” when asked how she would regain voters for the Conservatives.
She insisted the Lib Dems had gained so many seats in Parliament because Reform had split the Tories’ vote, adding: “If we can get our vote back from Reform I think that would tackle quite a lot of the Lib Dem threat that we face. That means being confident Conservatives again.”
But unlike Jenrick (above), who has pitched the leadership contest as a “leave or remain” battle over the ECHR, she said there were pieces of UK law she would like to see reformed first.
Badenoch said: “I think the Human Rights Act, for example, there is a lot that we can do there before looking at international treaties."
She also said there were problems with the Equality Act, which she described as largely a good piece of law, adding: “These are the legacies of (former prime minister Sir Tony) Blair’s constitutional settlement. We can unpick them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel