ARCHAEOLOGISTS have begun an investigation at the site of the Battle of Culloden to apply new “techniques” developed recently at Waterloo to potentially unearth more discoveries.
The historic battle took place on April 16, 1746, at Culloden, near Inverness, where a Jacobite army loyal to Bonnie Prince Charlie was defeated by a British government force commanded by the Duke of Cumberland.
Around 1600 men died at the battle, 1500 of them Jacobites, which led to the ending of the Jacobite rising of 1745.
Now archaeologists from the University of Glasgow and the National Trust for Scotland (NTS), are being joined by archaeology students and volunteers from RAF Lossiemouth and Kinloss Barracks in an investigation of the Highland battlefield.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond's body coming home tomorrow with cortege planned
Experts who took part in archaeological digs at the site of the 1815 Battle of Waterloo will be applying new techniques they developed at the Belgium site in Culloden.
They said previous archaeological work has helped historians gain a better understanding of the “bloody” battle from one of Scotland’s most significant historical sites.
Archaeologist and battlefields expert Prof Tony Pollard, of the University of Glasgow, said: “It's been nearly 20 years since I’ve worked on the archaeology of Culloden.
“It’s exciting to be back, and I’m looking forward to us applying archaeological techniques we’ve developed more recently at Waterloo, where, as we did at Culloden first time around, we have made a valuable contribution to our understanding of a battle which in its own bloody way made history.”
Previous digs have uncovered a wide range of artefacts, including a shoe buckle believed to have belonged to a clan chieftain, Donald Cameron of Lochiel.
Artillery weaponry, like grapeshot and musket balls, have also been found at the battlefield in the past.
Lorne MacLeod, visitor services assistant at Culloden, discovered the first artefact of the dig on Monday, uncovering what is believed to be a button.
NTS manages a large area of the Highland battlefield and said areas such as the Field of the English would be investigated by metal detecting.
The excavation combines traditional archaeological methods, such as grid-based test pits, with modern techniques which experts hope will unearth more secrets into the battle.
READ MORE: Ruined Scottish island croft wins prestigious architecture award after conversion
NTS’s head of archaeological services, Derek Alexander, said: “It's always exciting to be working at Culloden Battlefield and so many of the artefacts have great stories to tell.
“Even small-scale pieces of fieldwork can contribute to a better understanding of how the battle unfolded.”
The trust said the dig would be conducted with great care and respect due to the battlefield being a designated war grave.
Alexander said: “It's always exciting to be working at Culloden Battlefield and so many of the artefacts have great stories to tell.
“Even small-scale pieces of fieldwork can contribute to a better understanding of how the battle unfolded. We are really looking forward to working with Professor Pollard again and to making use of the techniques he has developed and honed at Waterloo.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here