THE Scottish Tories have been left fuming after the SNP appointed an interim chief executive who previously suggested that the monarchy should be executed.
On Saturday, the SNP announced that Carol Beattie, the former chief executive of Stirling Council, had been appointed as the party’s interim chief executive. It came after Murray Foote resigned the position on Friday, and the party’s national executive committee met to decide on its next steps.
Beattie’s appointment has drawn anger from the Conservatives after comments she made on social media over the summer came into the spotlight.
In June, the Telegraph’s Allison Pearson wrote an article on the Princess of Wales in which she said: “When lesser mortals would have stayed at home, Catherine proved that the show goes on.”
However, Pearson’s suggestion that “lesser mortals with [Kate’s] illness would have stayed home” sparked widespread backlash – with Republic chief executive Graham Smith calling it “offensive to millions of people who have to live with cancer”.
Beattie also criticised the Telegraph article, writing: “F*** all the way off with your gold plated serfdom!
“Time for the French solution to monarchy and sycophantic ‘journalists’.”
READ MORE: 'Better things to do': King Charles snubbed by top Australian politicians
Beattie was also reported to have written on social media that “intelligent people don’t support the monarchy” and that those who do “use them as symbols of their bigotry or xenophobic values”.
She apologised for “any offence caused by the language I used” and removed the posts, but the Tories have hit out.
Scottish Conservative finance spokesperson Craig Hoy raged: “Carol Beattie's shameful conduct and her endorsement of deeply offensive comments has no place in politics.
“It simply demonstrates the lack of morals at the top of the SNP hierarchy.”
Beattie had run for the SNP in the Falkirk South by-election, narrowly losing out to Scottish Labour in the seventh round of the vote count on Friday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel