KEIR Starmer’s government is planning to create as many as 200 new Labour peers despite previous pledges to abolish the chamber, according to reports.
The Sun quoted insiders in the party as saying: “Downing Street wants lots more peers who actually turn up, do the work and will get legislation through.
“They are looking for 200 peers.”
A second insider also told that paper they “definitely” wanted more peers, by Downing Street said they did not recognise the 200 number.
It comes after more than a year of reports that Labour is looking to load the House of Lords with loyal peers to combat the Conservative dominance in that chamber.
READ MORE: Labour's watered-down Lords reform plans clear first hurdle
In June 2023, a member of Starmer’s then shadow cabinet was quoted by the i as saying the party would “need to appoint dozens of them, at least”.
“The current cohort aren’t getting any younger, and there’s so few of them doing the actual work that they are increasingly knackered,” they added.
The Guardian quoted a Labour official as saying: “[Labour’s leader in the Lords] Angela Smith and [opposition chief whip] Roy Kennedy have been saying: if you want to get your legislation through you’re going to have to appoint a load.”
That paper calculated that Starmer would need to appoint around 100 new Labour peers in order to balance the number of Conservatives in the Lords.
Also in June 2023, Starmer’s official spokesperson insisted he stood by a pledge to abolish the Lords during his first term in office.
As it stands, there are 805 members of the House of Lords, according to the UK Parliament website. It is the most populous parliamentary house in the world other than the Chinese National People's Congress.
SNP depute leader at Westminster Pete Wishart told The National: "The sheer hypocrisy of Labour on the House of Lords is just simply staggering. This is a party that for over 100 years has told us that they were going to abolish the Lords, but there it sits, bigger and more bizarre than ever.
READ MORE: Fury as Keir Starmer appoints another peer to fill Government post
“The Lords isn’t anticipating its imminent demise but instead preparing for hundreds of more be-ermined Labour Lords.
“The issue for Labour is that they have their own donors, cronies and placemen to satisfy.
"With the House of Lords Bill going through the Commons we will be presenting a number of amendments asking for the exclusion of donors, bishops, and prime ministerial crony appointments.
“If we can’t secure an amendment to abolish the Lords itself we will see if we can abolish its membership.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel