THE UK’s Health Secretary has denied his plans to give weight-loss jabs to unemployed people would result in a “dystopian future”.
Speaking on the Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show, Wes Streeting acknowledged that weight-loss drugs would not be the only answer to tackling obesity after he suggested this week they could have a “monumental impact” on getting people into work.
Public health expert Dr Simon Williams told this week’s Sunday National that the plans “will not make a dent in the overall problem”.
READ MORE: Scottish estate owner caught up in £800m fraud inquiry
Streeting had said in an article for The Telegraph that “widening waistbands” were placing a burden on the NHS and that drugs could be administered to help get people back into employment.
Speaking to the BBC, he said: “Look I don’t think that the answer to obesity is simply weight-loss jabs but there is a lot of evidence to suggest already, and I’m really excited about the trial we’ll be doing with Lilly.”
The UK Government announced a £279 million investment from Lilly, the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, with the deal expected to include trials of weight loss jabs and the impact these can have on unemployment.
"I'm not interested in some dystopian future where I... involuntarily jab unemployed people who are overweight"
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) October 20, 2024
Health Secretary Wes Streeting says "the answer to obesity isn't simply weight-loss drugs" but they "could be game-changing"#BBCLauraK https://t.co/2tvra1zpxX pic.twitter.com/5YBLghenFH
The Health Secretary continued: “There’s a lot of evidence already that these jabs combined with changes to diet and exercise can help people to reduce their weight but also prevent cardiovascular disease and also diabetes which is game changing.
“And for a lot of people, particularly people who are morbidly obese, they will tell you through bitter experience even when they’ve tried to do the right thing they’ve found the challenge insurmountable.
“And these jabs can be a gamechanger on that.”
However, Streeting (above) conceded he did not want to create a “dependency culture” and added: “I’m also not interested in some dystopian future where I wander around involuntarily jabbing unemployed people who are overweight.
“That is not the agenda. Actually I think we’ve got an opposite challenge. I think demand at the moment, it will be greater than what we’re able to meet.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel