THE Labour Government should change its fiscal rules to allow borrowing for public sector investment, First Minister John Swinney will say in a speech on Monday.
Speaking ahead of the Budget on October 30, the SNP leader will address an audience of academics, think tanks and representatives of the public, private and third sector in Edinburgh.
He is expected to rail against planned cuts from Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the Budget – who is said to be looking at tax rises and spending cuts totalling £40 billion – instead urging her to boost public investment.
One of the changes, the First Minister is expected to say, should be movement on fiscal rules which would allow investment in public infrastructure. The current rules place a cap on public sector borrowing of 3%.
READ MORE: Labour's £40bn black hole 'the same as Brexit costs UK annually', figures show
Labour’s fiscal rules are “essentially the same” as the Tories’ and “pretty daft”, according to Institute for Fiscal Studies director Paul Johnson, who has also argued for more borrowing.
Last week, the “Labour Growth Group” of around 80 MPs urged Reeves to commit to changing fiscal rules in the upcoming Budget to invest in public services.
Swinney is expected to make a similar call in a keynote speech on Monday, saying: “In the advanced economies of the OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development], the average amount of public sector investment is nearly 4% of GDP a year.”
The OECD, which was founded in 1961 to “shape policies that foster prosperity and opportunity”, has 38 member states including some of the UK’s closest allies, such as France, the US, Australia, Ireland, Germany and Japan.
economy, for our public services and for UK citizens.
Swinney is expected to say: “These economies are spending nearly 50% more than the UK Government spends on investment. And the consequences are very real for our“Labour productivity grew by just 0.4% a year in the UK in the 12 years following the financial crisis, half the rate of the 25 richest OECD countries.
“And it means – as the Resolution Foundation has found – almost a decade and a half of lost earnings. It was only in 2023 that real wages were back to where they were before the financial crisis.
“Fifteen years of lost wage growth has cost the average worker £10,700 a year.
“We know what the solutions are. More houses, green jobs, targeted public investment in knowledge, infrastructure and nature.
READ MORE: Two-child cap 'limiting birth rate despite Scotland's demographic need', report says
“I want to see the UK Budget change the fiscal rules around borrowing to allow for greater investment in public infrastructure. But changing the rules is only the first step.”
The First Minister will also urge the UK Government to seek to increase public sector investment to at least 3% of GDP, eventually rising to the OECD average of 3.7%.
“It would mean that governments in all four nations could plan on the basis of stable, predictable funding arrangements to build the infrastructure we all need and which I want to deliver for Scotland,” he will say.
The UK Government has been contacted for comment.
The First Minister is also expected to push Reeves to increase public spending in the Budget, describing the past seven years as a “long, dark economic winter”.
“One thing is clear, we have reached a turning point, a pivotal moment for UK decision-making in a world of sustained turmoil,” he will say.
“That is why I believe the United Kingdom faces a make or break moment in this next Budget. It must be seized.”
It comes as the SNP also called on the Labour Government to commission and publish a report on the economic impact Brexit has had on the UK’s finances.
Stephen Gethins, the SNP MP for Arbroath and Broughty Ferry and his party’s international affairs spokesperson, highlighted that the £40bn Reeves is looking to raise with cuts and tax rises is the same as the Centre for European Reform estimated Brexit has cost the Treasury in lost receipts every year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel