JK Rowling has revealed that she turned down two offers of a peerage following Kemi Badenoch publicly saying she would appoint the author to the House of Lords.
The Harry Potter creator, 59, was praised by Badenoch for her highly critical commentary on the rights of transgender people.
Last week, Tory leadership contender Badenoch said that her and Rowling shared a belief when it came to transgender issues and claimed that anti-trans activists had been “attacked relentlessly by all sorts of oddballs and bad people”.
When asked if she would give Rowling a seat in the House of Lords, Badenoch told Talk TV: “I would. I don’t know whether she would take it, but I certainly would give her a peerage.”
READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch says she would give JK Rowling a peerage
However, Rowling has revealed that it isn't the first time she has been offered a place in the House of Lords.
“It’s considered bad form to talk about this but I’ll make an exception given the very particular circumstances," she said on X/Twitter.
“I’ve already turned down a peerage twice, once under Labour and once under the Tories. If offered one a third time, I still wouldn’t take it. It’s not her, it’s me.”
It comes after Badenoch claimed in an interview that she had “managed to get Dr Hilary Cass a peerage” following her controversial review of NHS gender identity services.
The Cass review, published in April, found care had been directed by “ideology on all sides” and was based on “remarkably weak evidence”.
Rowling welcomed the findings, which led to NHS England ending the prescription of puberty blockers for children experiencing gender dysphoria.
Scotland’s only clinic offering gender services to young people followed suit.
Yet some doctors and academics both in the UK and internationally have criticised the report, expressing concern about its methodology, and the British Medical Association has announced it will carry out an evaluation of the Cass Review.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel