DOZENS of Aberdeen homeowners who are affected by potentially dangerous concrete are refusing to take part in a voluntary purchase scheme.
The group of residents are calling for a guarantee that repair costs will not be deducted from the purchase of their homes.
Almost 140 private owners in the Torry area of the city live in homes where reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (Raac) has been found.
Aberdeen City Council is offering private homeowners the market value of their properties and a home loss payment of up to £15,000.
READ MORE: Summerhall issues statement amid '£500k HMRC tax battle'
However, the council is deducting the cost of repairing the Raac roof panels from the home value saying the valuation should reflect the current condition of the properties.
The local authority has elected to demolish around 350 Raac-affected council properties in the city.
Aberdeen City Council has written to those who own their homes asking if they wish to partake in a voluntary acquisition process.
One homeowner, John Meiklejohn, told the BBC he, along with a mass meeting with other residents last week, decided to refuse the scheme due to the “Raac penalty”.
“Ultimately, where we have this sticking block is the council were insistent on effectively deducting the cost of making the Raac panels good,” he told BBC Scotland News.
“We believe this will run into tens of thousands of pounds, leaving everyone in negative equity on their properties.
“The majority of people have agreed not to engage with the voluntary acquisition process until we receive written confirmation from Aberdeen City Council that the cost of making good the panels will be disregarded from the valuation of our homes.”
Meiklejohn told the BBC that costs from the council to remove and replace the Raac panels were between £40,000 and £71,000 per house.
Recent valuations suggest that some of the properties could be worth up to £130,000, and by deducting the theoretical cost of repairs it would have a significant impact on how much money owners would receive from the purchase scheme.
“I’m waking up at ridiculous times of the night and finding it difficult to get back to sleep,” Meiklejohn said.
READ MORE: Group representing firms arming Israel ramps up lobbying of MSPs
“My head keeps going over this, and the fact that I am going to effectively be knocked off the property market, with little to no chance of getting back onto it.”
Aberdeen City Council said only a “general form” of correspondence was currently taking place, while it continued to liaise with both council and private residents.
In a statement the local authority said: “The council agreed to purchase private properties by voluntary agreement to allow demolition to proceed safely and smoothly across the affected area.
“This was to be on the same basis as the CPO [compulsory purchase order] process.
“As a result, the valuation should reflect the current condition of the property, including the fact that the roof is constructed with Raac panels.
“Owners will be offered reasonable legal costs, and home loss and disturbance payments.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here