A SHERIFF has recommended the current system of pensioners declaring they are fit to drive be overhauled following an inquiry into the death of a three-year-old boy in Scotland.
Xander Irvine died after he was hit by a Kia Picanto car while out walking with his mother, Victoria, on Morningside Road, Edinburgh, on June 30, 2020.
The car was being driven by Edith Duncan whom, a fatal accident inquiry (FAI) in the city’s sheriff court heard earlier this year, was performing a turning manoeuvre when she accelerated and struck the boy and his mother.
READ MORE: See list of MSPs lobbied by group representing firms arming Israel
Irvine died in the capital’s Royal Hospital for Sick Children later the same day from “multiple injuries”.
Duncan, 91, who was facing prosecution for the incident, died a year later.
Sheriff Nigel Ross concluded Duncan, who had dementia, lost control of her car during the turning manoeuvre which caused her car to mount the pavement, striking Xander and his mother.
He said in a written FAI determination this loss of control was “entirely caused” by Duncan’s “inability” to perform safely “what would otherwise have been a routine turning manoeuvre”.
He added the collision could have been avoided if Duncan’s cognitive ability had been properly assessed and had authorities subsequently moved to revoke her driving licence.
“Revocation was both reasonable and required in light of her cognitive impairment and consequent inability to drive safely,” he found.
“Had reasonable precautions been taken, prior to the collision, to assess Edith Duncan’s cognitive ability, these would have identified that she required further assessment of her driving ability.
“That further assessment would have, in turn, led to the conclusion that she was significantly cognitively impaired and unfit to hold a driving licence.
“The DVLA would have revoked her licence on that basis. Accordingly, had her cognitive impairment been detected, the incident would have been avoided.”
Ross went on to describe the current system of self-certification of fitness to drive for people over 70 years of age as “significantly defective”.
READ MORE: Chaos as Labour publish NHS consultation responses in real time
He recommended an overhaul of the system including limiting self-certification to people aged under 80 and requiring anyone over 80 to undertake a cognitive assessment before a renewed licence is granted.
“The current regime of self-certification of fitness for drivers over 70 years of age is significantly defective,” he said.
“It relies on self-certification by the applicant driver. It fails to identify unfitness to drive in applicants who either deliberately, or unintentionally, fail to give correct information on the relevant application form.
“It fails to recognise that driving ability may decline with age, or that dementia sufferers may be unaware of their own condition.
“I recommend … that the present system of self-certification of fitness to drive after the age of 70 years be changed as a matter of priority, by limiting self-certification of fitness to drive only to applications before the age of 80 years.
“Application for renewal should continue to be required every three years, from the age of 70 onwards.
“Any application for renewal by a driver aged 80 or older should not be granted unless the applicant driver has successfully undertaken a short, initial, cognitive assessment.
“Failure to pass that assessment should result in both the application for renewal, and any current licence, being suspended pending further assessment.”
Ross also recommended further questions be added to the current application form for renewal of a driving licence to prompt information about recent driving history.
The sheriff’s recommendation to alter the self-certification of fitness to drive would require changes to primary legislation, which would be a matter for the UK Government to consider.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel