AN SNP MP behind efforts to set up a Scottish visa has insisted “all is not lost” in a defiant response to the Home Office shooting down the idea.
Last week, the UK Government dismissed the idea of a bespoke Scottish visa scheme after reports suggested Labour were considering the policy to help combat unique migration issues facing Scotland.
In a Westminster Hall debate, MP for Glasgow East John Grady said the party wanted to bring more workers to Scotland and suggested that the new UK Government may be working on proposals, but the Home Office has since slapped down the suggestion.
However, Stephen Gethins, who has lodged a bill seeking an amendment to the Scotland Act 1998 to enable the Scottish Government to set up a Scottish visa, has written a defiant blog post insisting he is not giving up.
READ MORE: Labour 'slapping down' their Scottish MPs on immigration policy
Scottish Labour MP Torcuil Crichton said “it should not be beyond us to devise ways to attract more people to work and settle” in Scotland, and Gethins said he agreed politicians should be working to find a solution.
He said in a blog post for Reform Scotland: “I was initially pleased last week when I heard Labour MPs make positive noises about such a move [for a Scottish visa].
“But we did not have to wait too long for the Home Office to quash this bout of independent thinking from Labour MPs.
“That is a great pity. It should not be beyond us to find a solution to how we can find ways to give Scotland more of a say on migration. Devolution always meant that there was a recognition that there is no one-size-fits-all solution across the UK.
“This is the case for a migration system that applies a common policy for Scotland and the south-east of England – two parts of the UK with quite distinctive needs.
“The Home Office’s remarks were disappointing, but all is not lost. My private members bill has been introduced in the very broadest terms. What is more, it does not have a second reading until April next year (unless of course the Government grants it time before then).
READ MORE: Will Scottish Labour MPs back my Scotland visa bill?
“The terms of that legislation means there is scope for compromise and innovative solutions to be introduced. No one in Parliament has a monopoly of wisdom, and people also expect us to find common ground and seek to work together where possible.”
Gethins highlighted how just before the EU referendum, former Tory minister Michael Gove had suggested that Scotland should decide its immigration policy if the Leave campaign was successful.
Meanwhile, Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie said just before this year’s General Election her party was open to talks with the Scottish Government on a Scottish visa.
While he is keen to see Scotland rejoin the EU as an independent state, Gethins said in the interim “we all have a responsibility to make things better”.
“We owe it to our world-leading industries to have a better discussion and debate,” Gethins said.
“Working in the higher education sector I saw at first hand how migration is one of the key components that makes the sector a global leader, in the process enriching the learning experience for Scottish students.”
He added: “This is an idea that has cross-party and cross-sector approach in Scotland and would be a great first step in demonstrating that parties, stakeholders and both governments can come together and reach agreement on even the thorniest issues.
“That would be something for us all to celebrate.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel