THE UK Government has been slated after reportedly giving Paddington bear a passport.
Rob Silva, co-producer of the latest film based on the exploits of the Peruvian bear, told the Radio Times the production had asked for a replica passport from the Home Office.
But he claimed they had in fact delivered an “official passport” for Paddington. Silva added: “You wouldn’t think the Home Office would have a sense of humour, but under official observations, they’ve just listed him as Bear.”
The BBC however reported that the Home Office had provided the filmmakers with a “specimen document” and that it could not be used – not least because Paddington is a computer-generated cartoon bear.
The news has elicited groans from social media users. One commentator responded to the story saying: “Twee Britain strikes again, with a torpedo of pure cringe.”
READ MORE: Jet2 flight from Scottish airport declares mid-air emergency
One Twitter/X user said: “This country needs to get over its fixation with Paddington Bear – it is a sickness.”
Another added: “This is going to end up in a nine-day news cycle that ends up with a minister admitting that the proper decision would have been to deport Paddington, or something, isn’t it?”
Others struck a more sombre note and said the Home Office’s actions to help the filmmakers contrasted with what they said were the uncaring bureaucracy people encounter in dealing with the department.
One social media user said: “If only the Home Office showed similar compassion to others forced to flee their country as it has done to Paddington.”
READ MORE: Scottish beach named among best coastal spots in the UK
And a journalist added: “Once interviewed an immigration lawyer about Paddington’s chances of settling in the UK and getting a passport.
“The conclusion was that he’d be absolutely stuffed due to British immigration policy.”
Another said: “Paddington first appeared as a character in 1958.
“The Home Office taking 66 years to give him citizenship is the kind of speed and competence most asylum seekers have come to expect from the performatively cruel UK Government.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here