SCOTTISH Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie has said the indigenous people of Australia deserve a “proper apology” after King Charles was berated by a senator during his visit to the country.
We told on Monday how senator Lidia Thorpe waited until the end of a landmark speech Charles gave at Australia’s Parliament House to claim “genocide” had been committed against the Commonwealth country’s indigenous people.
Charles and Camilla have faced protests during their tour and, on Tuesday, a well-known aboriginal activist was arrested for staging a protest against Charles’s visit.
NEW: This is the moment King Charles's speech in Australia's Parliament House was interrupted by Senator Lidia Thorpe, who told him: 'You are not my King'
— The National (@ScotNational) October 21, 2024
🗣 'You have committed genocide against our people.' pic.twitter.com/KkExsbCGTb
During her protest, Thorpe could be heard shouting: “You are not our king, you are not sovereign … you have committed genocide against our people.
“Give us our land back. Give us what you stole from us … our babies, our people. You destroyed our land.”
Thorpe sits as an independent in the upper house of the Australian parliament. Harvie said her response was “justified by her own experiences as an indigenous woman”.
READ MORE: Steph Paton: Lidia Thorpe called out a vile colonial mindset
Speaking to The National, he said the British monarch is an “increasingly outdated institution that has no place in a modern, democratic society”.
“The harm caused by the former British empire cannot be dismissed or brushed over,” he added.
“While the King did not personally commit the crimes of the past, he has benefited greatly from colonialism, and continues to do so.
“The indigenous people of Australia deserve a proper apology from the figureheads who today represent the former British empire for the abhorrent mistreatment of their people through deep-rooted colonialism.
“The aftershock of this mistreatment has undoubtedly impacted indigenous generations through to the present day, and strong emotional responses like senator Lidia Thorpe’s are justified by her own experiences as an indigenous woman.
“Whether they wish to keep the monarch is for Australia to decide, just as it should be for Scotland to decide whether we want a monarchy.
“No other country should be entitled to make that choice on their behalf.”
Prior to Charles’s (above) arrival, Thorpe issued a statement in which she said, “First Peoples never ceded our sovereignty over this land” and that “the Crown invaded this country, has nought sought a treaty with First Peoples, and committed a genocide of our people”.
“King Charles is not the legitimate sovereign of these lands,” she added.
The politician later defended the interruption, saying she had done so to draw attention to the plight of indigenous people in the country.
“I did it for truth telling,” she said.
“Global truth telling about the royals who cause so much devastation to not only our people in this country but indigenous people around the world.
“We don’t have a treaty in this country, we’ve been calling for decades and decades for a treaty.
“Our jails are full of aboriginal people. We have 23,000 aboriginal children that have been taken from their families.
“We have over 600 deaths in custody where no one has ever been held accountable. We have our bones and our skulls still in his [King Charles] possession, or his family’s possession.
“We want that back, we want that land back and we want your King to take some leadership and sit at the table and discuss a treaty with us.”
She was also asked by Sky News presenter Kay Burley why she had called King Charles “genocidal”.
READ MORE: SNP MP calls out UK Government for hypocrisy on Israel war crimes
Thorpe said: “There’s thousands of massacre sites in this country from invasions and someone needs to answer for that.”
Burley replied: “And that’s the King?”
“If he is the successor, then he needs to answer,” said Thorpe.
Scottish anti-monarchy group Our Republic supported Thorpe’s move, saying it was right for Charles to be confronted with the “blood-soaked histories” of the royal family.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel