PUPILS attending a military boarding school in Scotland were subjected to “dreadful abuse” in an environment where “violence was allowed to prevail”, an inquiry has found.
Lady Smith, who chairs the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry, said children attending Queen Victoria School (QVS) in Dunblane decades ago were physically and emotionally abused by teachers and older children, which ought to have been “obvious” to those responsible for running the school.
Pupils were beaten or hit by “a small number of teachers” with belts, slippers, a cricket bat and wooden dusters “under the guise of corporal punishment”, she said.
READ MORE: John Swinney says Glasgow Commonwealth games should be 'Chris Hoy Games'
Older children would also subject younger ones to “cruel and terrifying behaviour” such as tying them to chairs and putting bags over their heads.
QVS was constituted by a royal warrant initiated by Queen Victoria but enacted by her son, King Edward, who signed it in 1905.
The school was established with the initial aim to provide support and education to sons of Scottish servicemen of ranks other than officers.
Smith made her remarks about the school as the latest volume of her inquiry findings were published on Tuesday.
She said: “The pupils at QVS were all boarders and they were exposed to risks of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse. For many of them, those risks materialised and children suffered abuse.
“I have no difficulty in finding that children were abused by staff whose abusive practices were such that they must, or at least ought to, have been obvious to those in positions of responsibility.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond's private funeral date confirmed
“Further, they were abused by senior and other pupils, some of whose practices must or ought to have been obvious.
“It was mistakenly assumed the background and governance of the school would be enough to provide appropriate residential care.
“Throughout many decades, particularly the late 1950s to the early 1990s, that assumption was ill-founded, and, in fact, children for whose care the school was responsible were abused.
“Factors that enabled abuse to occur included inadequate management and oversight, not enough staff, and undue adherence to a robust military culture.
“The culture of the school was such that pupils were subjected to initiation ceremonies, there was a hierarchy that enabled abuse of power by senior pupils, differences were not tolerated, and pupils were, at times, not treated as the children they were.
“A culture of silence was the norm. Staff encouraged pupils not to clipe or report, and some ignored obvious abuse.”
Smith added: “Violence was allowed to prevail at QVS. “A small number of teachers abused children physically and emotionally under the guise of corporal punishment, using belts, slippers, a cricket bat, and heavy wooden dusters, and instilling fear.
“Violence by older boys towards younger boys was endemic. It included unofficial punishments by boys in authority, either prefects or monitors, especially up to the 1980s.
“Cruel and terrifying behaviour by older boys towards junior boys was commonplace in the senior boarding houses.
READ MORE: John Mason says he won't appeal expulsion from SNP
“It included tying boys to chairs, putting bags over their heads, and, in one case, threatening to throw a child down a lift shaft.”
She concluded: “The current management, the commissioners, and the MoD now understand that there is no room for complacency given the abuse that has taken place since 2010 despite the child protection systems and policies that had been put in place.
“QVS apologised for the abuse experienced by children who had been entrusted into its care.”
Smith has now published 13 volumes of inquiry findings, one of the most recent relating to Gordonstoun.
Further case study findings in relation to others boarding schools will follow.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said on behalf of QVS: “Every child deserves to feel safe and protected and the experiences of past students at QVS were totally unacceptable.
“We have worked extensively with the inquiry and the school is committed to ensuring this never happens again.
“The school has multiple ways for students and staff to report anything that makes them feel uncomfortable, so that pupils are confident they are studying in an environment of transparency and trust.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel