A SCOTTISH council has objected to Holyrood boundary changes that they say would “disregard local identities”.
West Lothian Council has objected to the changes which would see Whitburn and Fauldhouse removed from the county and put in with Airdrie — 14 miles west — in North Lanarkshire.
The same proposed changes would see West Lothian removed from the Lothian’s regional list and into a Central Scotland list for a choice of MSPs in the 2026 election.
Boundaries Scotland is undertaking the second review of Scottish Parliament boundaries and is consulting on revised constituency proposals and proposals for regions.
READ MORE: Axing the Tax: The National series explores council tax reform
A motion from council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick said the proposals contravened two of the four rules laid down governing boundary changes.
He told a meeting of the executive: “This proposal disregards the boundaries of West Lothian and very strong existing ties with these communities.
"By splitting two West Lothian Council wards between Airdrie and the other constituencies the proposals conflict with the fact that regard must be had to the boundaries and rule four they disregard local identities, links and ties with local communities.
“I think we all agree Fauldhouse and Whitburn have strong links to the rest of West Lothian. In terms of work education people from these communities are more likely to commute to and work in Livingston, Bathgate and Edinburgh.”
READ MORE: Planned changes to Scotland's parliamentary regions revealed
Children from Longridge and Stoneyburn go to Whitburn Academy or St Kentigern’s in Blackburn.
Removal of the two communities would also clash with existing boundaries within police and fire divisions, as well as different health board areas.
“A third rule three allows us to depart from the strict applications of the others.”
Councillor Fitzpatrick said that West Lothian had very strong links to other regions within the Lothians, much more than to communities to the west in the North Lanarkshire Council area.
The motion was passed without objection.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel