THERE are no plans to host weddings for members of the public on the King’s Balmoral Estate, a spokesman for the royal residence has said amid reports of potential events being considered.
Weddings are mentioned in plans a representative for the Aberdeenshire estate had lodged for the Queen’s Building, on the grounds near Balmoral Castle but a spokesperson has rejected the idea.
The plans lodged state the venue “may be used for weddings, dinners, meetings and associated events”, which it said would be “rare throughout the year”.
READ MORE: Video shows Theresa May attempt Scottish accent in first Lords speech
But a spokesman for the estate said: “There are no plans for Balmoral to host weddings as a commercial venture.”
It is understood the estate has had the capability to host functions and events, both private and public, for a number of years.
The private Scottish home has been handed down through generations of royals after being bought for Queen Victoria by Prince Albert in 1852, and is used as a royal summer retreat.
Queen Elizabeth II died at Balmoral in September 2022.
READ MORE: Royal family to charge £250 for 'special' dinner at Balmoral
Charles has opened up the castle to public tours this year, which sold out within 24 hours.
Tickets for the guided tours, priced at £100 or £150 with afternoon tea, enabled 40 people each day to visit the royal residence from July 1 to August 4.
Now, the estate plans to revamp the layout of the Queen’s Building with a new reception area and expanded outdoor area on the patio, increasing capacity from 250 to 277 people inside and 40 to 144 outside.
Inside, alcohol could be served up to 12.30am and events could involve live performances and dancing.
An application set to go before the Aberdeenshire Licensing Board meeting next week argues certain conditions on the outdoor area are not required, describing it as a “pleasant outdoor area for family dining located in the confines of the private estate property”.
Addressing a condition preventing amplified music being played outside, the application states there is “no realistic possibility of the public or of any neighbour being disturbed” as music will be kept to a “low level”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel