LABOUR have been warned that Scotland “cannot afford even more cuts” after a new report found that Scotland’s block grant has fallen to its lowest share of UK Government spending in nearly a decade.
Analysis by the House of Commons Library, commissioned by the SNP, showed that the proportion of Westminster spending on Holyrood has decreased from 8.2% in 2015/16 to 7.6% as of July this year.
The SNP said this meant Scotland’s block grant was worth £6.4 billion less than it was in 2020/21 – a drop of 12.7%.
The figures were calculated before any adjustments were made to reflect the devolution of tax and welfare powers to the Scottish Parliament.
READ MORE: BBC apologises after SNP hit out at 'false claim' on Scottish income tax
The Scottish Government has said its capital budget has already been cut by 9.6% – about £600 million after being adjusted for inflation – while another 3% cut is on its way this year.
The capital budget is set aside for spending on longer-term projects such as buildings and infrastructure like roads.
The SNP said that came at the same as Holyrood’s resource budget, which pays for day-to-day spending on things such as the NHS, has been cut by nearly 15% in real terms since 2020.
Labour won the election in July, to reverse the cuts.
The party urged the Chancellor, who will soon deliver her first Budget sinceBut it comes as Rachel Reeves is looking to raise up to £40bn from tax hikes and cuts, while her spending plans have already been agreed with Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Starmer has previously warned that the Budget, to be delivered at the end of the month, will be “painful” and that things will get worse before they get better.
READ MORE: Labour's £40bn black hole 'the same as Brexit costs UK annually', figures show
David Doogan MP, the SNP’s economy spokesperson at Westminster, said: “It’s vital that the Labour Government finally listens to voters and abandons its devastating plan to impose billions of pounds of austerity cuts to public services and Scotland’s budget.
“The Scottish Government has already had its budget slashed by Westminster.
“We cannot afford even more cuts from the Labour Party, which would take money away from our NHS, schools, police and vital infrastructure projects like affordable housing, roads and hospitals.
“Voters were promised change but instead Labour ministers have been lining their own pockets with thousands of pounds of freebies, while imposing painful austerity cuts on the rest of us.”
READ MORE: Richard Murphy: It’s no mystery why Rachel Reeves is in a mess ahead of the Budget
Doogan warned Reeves of “starving Scotland of investment” in her Budget, which the Chancellor has promised will be a “reset” for the UK.
Reeves has said financial problems in the UK cannot “just be magicked away” and has pointed to a £22bn “financial black hole” left over by the previous government.
Doogan said: “Instead of imposing even deeper cuts, the Labour Government must abandon its devastating plans for austerity, reverse the cuts to Scotland’s budget and deliver the major investment boost needed to protect public services and get the economy growing.
“The Labour Party can’t face both ways on this. If they impose austerity cuts at Westminster, they will hit public services and communities right across Scotland – and they won’t be forgiven.”
The UK Government has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel