A SCOTTISH couple who launched a legal challenge against both the UK and Scottish governments over cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment have been given permission to proceed to a full hearing.
Peter and Florence Fanning — a couple in their 70s from Coatbridge who are in receipt of the state pension and a modest occupational pension — raised proceedings for judicial review of the decision in the Court of Session.
The Fannings, who are being represented by Govan Law Centre, believe the governments have not given due regard to equalities legislation in their decision and that the move was unlawful.
Former first minister Alex Salmond previously gave the couple his backing and put them in touch with their current legal representation. The Alba leader has since died from a heart attack while he was in North Macedonia.
READ MORE: The Coatbridge couple launching legal action over the Winter Fuel Payment
The judicial review has now been given permission for a hearing, which is scheduled for the Court of Session in Edinburgh in January.
The case asks the court to rule on whether the decision was unlawful, which would then allow the petitioners to ask the court to, in effect, set aside the policy and restore the Winter Fuel Payment to all.
Alba welcomed the decision, with acting leader Kenny MacAskill commenting : "Alex Salmond was a champion of this campaign and had been fully supportive of the Fanning’s in their case vs the Scottish and UK Governments.
“The Scottish Government should have been standing up for Scotland’s pensioners against Westminster cuts, instead they will now be standing shoulder to shoulder with the UK Labour Government in court against the pensioners of Scotland.”
The Winter Fuel Payment gave all pensioners £200 to £300 to ensure they could heat their homes over the colder season but this will now be means-tested with only those on Pension Credit or other benefits receiving it going forward.
Earlier this month, Holyrood voted overwhelming against the cut with two Labour MSPs including a former party leader rebelling against Anas Sarwar.
Speaking at a press conference in Edinburgh in September, Fanning, 73, said: “We intend to sue both the London and Scottish governments, since both are guilty through action and inaction, of damaging the welfare of pensioners.
“We are hoping to be successful, given the manifest injustice involved, however, my work as a trade unionist and shop steward has taught me that some battles are worth fighting regardless of the outcome – I believe this is one such battle.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel