THE Prime Minister has confronted calls for the UK to pay reparations for its historical role in the slave trade while surrounded by Commonwealth leaders.
Speaking at an executive session of a Commonwealth summit in Samoa, Keir Starmer said it was important to acknowledge a “hard” shared history, and that he understood the “strength of feeling” about reparations.
Downing Street has already ruled out non-financial reparations and maintained its position on the matter is “clear”.
Flanked by leaders from Uganda and Tanzania, Starmer (above) said he wanted to work “together to make sure the future is not in the shadow of the past,” and promised to host a UK-Caribbean forum with leaders of the nations most impacted by slavery’s legacy.
The Prime Minister has insisted reparations are not on the table for the Commonwealth summit, even as leaders from Caribbean and African member states have called for discussions on the issue.
The UK has conceded that the issue of reparations could be included in a document due to be signed off at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting this week.
READ MORE: Scottish couple's legal action on Winter Fuel Payment approved
Sources accept that there could be a reference to reparatory justice in the communique, but officials stressed that this would not necessarily mean any change in the UK’s policy position.
Downing Street said yes when asked if they were ruling out non-cash reparations on Friday, and have also said that their position on reparations also covers non-financial reparations.
The Prime Minister’s deputy spokesperson said: “Our position on reparations is clear, and that goes for other forms of non-financial reparatory justice too.
“The Prime Minister’s focus is on addressing the challenges that we face.”
Speaking at the executive session alongside other leaders at the summit, the Prime Minister said: “We must also acknowledge our shared history – especially when it’s hard.
“I understand the strength of feeling here and that there are some calls to face up to the harms and injustices of the past through reparatory justice.”
The Prime Minister stressed the “most effective way to maintain a spirit of respect and dignity is by working together to make sure the future is not in the shadow of the past, but is illuminated by it”.
He announced Britain will host a UK-Caribbean forum in 2025, “focused on looking forward, not back”.
Climate resilience, education, trade and growth would be on its agenda he said.
Throughout his time in Samoa, Starmer has met with leaders from across the Commonwealth, including his Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese.
But a meeting between the Prime Minister and Ghana’s president Nana Akufo-Addo did not go ahead as expected.
They were instead expected to speak at a dinner hosted by the King, or at the final meeting between Commonwealth leaders on the summit’s final day.
The Ghanaian delegation had not planned to raise the topic of reparations at the meeting with Starmer, it is understood, but is keen to start a discussion on the matter.
The Prime Minister did however meet with the President of Guyana Irfaan Ali – another supporter of reparations – though the matter was not raised as they shook hands in front of the media.
While the Prime Minister’s stance on reparations remains unchanged, he has said that this generation should have a conversation about the history of slavery.
READ MORE: King Charles panned for 'empty rhetoric' in Commonwealth speech
He told the BBC: “We should look at what are today’s challenges in this group of countries represented here today.
“And in the discussions I’ve already had before I came here, and since I’ve been here, it’s very clear to me that the major challenges are resilience in the face of climate challenges and also the question of how we improve trade between our countries.”
Asked if he thinks this generation can be held responsible for the actions of their forebears, Starmer replied: “I think our generation can say the slave trade and practice was abhorrent, and we should, you know, we talk about our history. We can’t change our history, but we should certainly talk about our history.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel