THE UNIVERSITY of Edinburgh and the University of Glasgow carried some of the highest number of animal tests last year, according to figures from Understanding Animal Research (UAR)
.UAR published a list of the ten UK organisations that carried out the highest number of animal procedures in 2023
The figures show that the University of Edinburgh carried out the fifth highest number of animal tests at 139,881. The University of Glasgow ranks ninth at 102,089 tests.
Topping the list is the University of Cambridge at 223,787. The top ten organisations listed represent 54% of all animal testing for scientific research conducted in the UK.
READ MORE: Scottish university uses technology to ‘see inside’ body in UK first
The top ten animal-testing organisations are:
- University of Cambridge - 223,787
- University of Oxford - 194,913
- The Francis Crick Institute - 192,920
- UCL - 176,019
- University of Edinburgh - 139,881
- Medical Research Council - 124,156
- University of Manchester - 110,885
- King's College London - 109,779
- University of Glasgow - 102,089
- Imperial College London - 60,580
The figures reflect animals used in medical, veterinary, and scientific research. More than 99% were carried out on mice, fish and rats and 82% were classified as causing pain equivalent to, or less than, an injection.
Both universities document the perceived pain severity levels of procedures ranging from subthreshold, where the animals do not suffer, to severe and non-recovery.
Edinburgh’s research for 2023 was 57.4% subthreshold while Glasgow’s comes in at 55.34%.
Dr Catherine Martin, Vice-Principal for Corporate Services at the University of Edinburgh, said: “Research involving animals plays an important role in helping world-leading researchers at the University of Edinburgh to address some of the most difficult problems in human and animal health.
"We use alternatives wherever it is possible, but some important questions can still only be answered by using animals as part of our research.
"As an institution, we are deeply committed to maintaining the highest standards of animal welfare, and to putting into practice the principles of replacing, refining and reducing the use of animals in our research.”
The University of Glasgow has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here