THE Labour Government Budget “will end the era of austerity”, Anas Sarwar has claimed – on the same day as the Prime Minister warned that the UK must “embrace the harsh light of fiscal reality”.
In a column for the Daily Record, the Scottish Labour pledged that the UK Government would “mark the end of austerity — a despicable Tory policy that decimated public services and targeted the most vulnerable while giving those that caused economic chaos a free pass”.
He further said that the “Chancellor will have to raise revenues, but any tax rises must fall on those with the broadest shoulders”.
“This Budget will be a turning point and nothing like the Budgets of recent times,” Sarwar wrote.
READ MORE: SNP slam UK Government as GB Energy chief based in England
“In 2010, George Osborne delivered an Austerity Budget that ripped the heart out of local communities and punished working families. In 2022, Kwasi Kwarteng’s reckless ‘Mini-Budget’ sent markets into a panic and Scots’ mortgages and bills rocketing …
“This week, Rachel Reeves will make history as the first female Chancellor to deliver a Budget. She knows that fixing the foundations of our economy means facing up to the £22 billion black hole that the Tories tried to hide head on, or it will pose risks for years to come.”
However, the comments come as Keir Starmer is set to deliver a speech in which he will warn: “We have to be realistic about where we are as a country. This is not 1997, when the economy was decent but public services were on their knees.
“And it’s not 2010, where public services were strong, but the public finances were weak. These are unprecedented circumstances.”
transport, and housing are said to be on the chopping block.
Reports have said that Chancellor Rachel Reeves has asked UK Government departments to make cuts of around 2%. Justice,Reeves’s Budget is also expected to include a series of tax hikes, including an increase to employer national insurance by at least one percentage point and an extension of the freeze on income tax thresholds introduced under the Tories.
The Chancellor is also planning to change her “fiscal rules” to allow an extra £50bn of borrowing for capital investment by the end of the current parliament. Capital projects are separate from the day-to-day revenue spending to keep departments running.
Responding to the news from the UK Government, Professor Richard Murphy said the planned cuts amounted to austerity.
READ MORE: Chris McEleny: We must treat businesses better to help drive case for independence
The economist wrote on social media: “‘Reeves will cut the day-to-day spending budgets for departments including the Ministry of Justice, the transport department and the housing department.’ “Austerity, then. More crime, more carbon and fewer houses won’t work for anyone.”
He added: “A momentous budget? That looks pretty unlikely. Reeves has promised a great Labour Budget event. A damp squib of incoherence seems to be a lot more likely.”
Former SNP MP John Nicolson contrasted quotes from Sarwar and Starmer.
He wrote on Twitter/X: “Pre-election Sarwar promise: ‘Read my lips. No austerity under a Labour Government.’
“Post-election Starmer: ‘Embrace the harsh light of fiscal reality’ with billions of pounds’ worth of spending cuts.
“Ever feel you've been duped Scotland?”
The Labour Government Budget will be laid out by the Chancellor on Wednesday, October 30.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel