A LABOUR-BACKING journalist has made a stunning admission, saying Keir Starmer “essentially said whatever he felt he needed to get elected”.
Veteran political journalist and associate editor at the Daily Mirror, Kevin Maguire, made the remarks while discussing how Labour are preparing for the announcement of the Autumn Budget later this week.
He appeared on ITV's Good Morning Britain show, where he said the proof was always going to be “in the eating of the pudding” following the election.
He also discussed how the Prime Minister’s government has already seemingly lost the trust of the UK public after failing to follow through on election campaign promises.
Maguire’s comments come ahead of Starmer’s speech in the West Midlands on Monday, where he is expected to lay the groundwork for what the public and business can expect from the budget.
READ MORE: Expert weighs in on alternatives to council tax in Scotland
The Autumn Budget will be Labour’s first since 2009 which will be announced on Wednesday by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves.
On the Good Morning Britain show Maguire said: "Keir Starmer’s pledge to restore trust in politics has completely and utterly gone.
“It's just disappeared.”
He continued: “It was always going to be, the proof was always going to be in the eating of the pudding.
“What you do when you are in power.
“Of course, what he did is he essentially said whatever he felt he needed to, to get elected.
“Now that’s not unusual, it’s not unusual.
“Lots of politicians do it, but if you’re going to do that and you’re playing the same tricks as your opponent's then you can’t say you’re going to restore trust.”
Starmer has seen confidence in his government eroded since Labour took power in July.
He has been embroiled in an expense scandal while choosing to keep the Tories' policy of a two-child benefit cap and scrapping the means testing for the Winter Fuel Payment.
A sleuth of spending cuts are expected on Wednesday’s announcement as Labour aims to plug a “£22 billion black hole” in public finances.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel