RUSSELL Findlay has been told he has “some nerve” by the First Minister during a heated debate on the Budget at FMQs.
It comes after the Labour Government delivered its first Budget on Tuesday with the Scottish Tory leader taking issue with the Scottish Government saying it was a “step in the right direction”.
Swinney in turn hit back at Findlay, pointing out that the Scottish Tory leader was a supporter of former prime minister Liz Truss’s disastrous mini-budget.
The First Minister said he had “sympathy” with Labour’s Budget as it was a product of the “menacing agenda” of 14 years of a Tory government.
He said it was the “ultimate deceit for Mr Findlay and the Conservatives to criticise those of us who have to take difficult decisions to clear up the mess that the Conservatives have created”.
Swinney explained that decisions had been made to increase tax in a bid to improve public services after the Scottish Tory leader called for tax cuts.
The First Minister's comments have been read as a suggestion that there will be no tax cuts in the Scottish Budget, which is due to be announced on December 4.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Here's what I made of Labour's Budget
“If Mr Findlay, wants to stand here and defend spending cuts to the people of Scotland, he’s welcome to do it,” Swinney said.
“I’m not going to follow in his footsteps.”
Findlay hit back, saying the First Minister’s “dirty fingerprints were all over the tram scandal, the ferry scandal, the Salmond inquiry scandal, the named persons scandal,” asking “how much has this man’s mistakes cost all of us?”
Findlay joked that he had “touched a nerve” with Swinney and said: “The tax burden on Scottish businesses and workers is far too high.
“But the SNP and Labour think they’re entitled to keep taking more and more while Scotland’s public services get worse and worse.
“This drives the disconnect between politicians and people. In the Scottish Budget, John Swinney could go another way.
“The SNP could stop raising taxes and let people keep more of their own hard-earned money so why won’t John Swinney look to bring down bills for Scottish businesses and workers.”
The Treasury had to assuage fears that hiking National Insurance contributions for employers would place additional strain on Scottish public finances, and there were suggestions it would cover the expected cost of £500 million.
Swinney replied: “The problem with what Mr Findlay brings to Parliament, which his colleagues bring to Parliament, is that he’s standing in front of me today arguing for a reduction in taxation.
“That involves a reduction then in public expenditure. But the problem, now I’m being told that it’s not correct, so I’m going to say it again because that is what is involved.
“If you reduce taxation, then you reduce public expenditure. We have to balance the budget and of course we’ve done that for 17 continuous years as the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: Scotland 'subsides' London energy bills, says financial analyst
“But the problem with Mr Findlay is that he’s here today talking about tax cuts, every other day of the week the Tories are here demanding we spend more money on different aspects of the public services.
“So when Mr Findlay talks about nerves, the issue is not touching a raw nerve with me, it’s the nerve of Mr Findlay who comes here calling for reductions in tax when he wants us to spend more.
“That’s some nerve Presiding Officer.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel