THE Scottish Government has proposed plans to cap the amount rent can be increased to a maximum of 6% in control areas.
The Housing (Scotland) Bill was lodged earlier this year, and the legislation allows ministers to create rent control zones following a recommendation from local councils.
The bill initially did not set out the size of the caps, but Housing Minister Paul McLennan on Thursday said rents would not be able to rise higher than 1% above the rate of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), up to a maximum of 6%.
The Scottish Government said the rent cap will support tenants and will help to tackle poverty, whilst providing appropriate protection for the property rights of landlords and supporting investment.
READ MORE: Labour Budget raises '£500 million question for Scotland', First Minister says
McLennan said the bill will include reforms which will help ensure people have a safe, secure, and affordable place to live.
He said: “This amendment responds directly to calls for greater certainty and will offer more clarity to tenants, landlords and those who invest in and develop rented homes.
“Setting out the cap in this way, with CPI as its basis, allows for a reflection of the costs of landlords to offering a property for rent, while offering protections to tenants in terms of limiting more significant rent increases.”
Caps will be in place between tenancies, as well as throughout, in the selected zones, but McLennan (below) said there will be exemptions to allow certain properties to avoid the caps.
A consultation will take place this spring on how exemptions should be applied, but the minister indicated in Holyrood that mid-market rent properties are one such option.
However, the Scottish Greens have condemned the proposal saying the SNP are betraying tenants with “watered down rent controls” by imposing above inflation rent hikes.
The Housing Bill was originally published by then Scottish Green Minister Patrick Harvie and followed an emergency rent freeze.
The Scottish Government's announcement comes just five months after MSPs declared a housing emergency.
Scottish Greens social justice spokesperson, Maggie Chapman (below), said stabilising rents at unaffordable levels is no use to anyone bar "profiteering landlords".
She said: “This is a shameful betrayal of tenants. It will impose above inflation rent hikes on households all over Scotland.
“Stabilising rents at unaffordable levels is no use to anyone, apart from profiteering landlords. If the SNP goes ahead with these disastrous plans they will be selling-out renters and entrenching a broken and unfair system.
She added: “This is yet another example of an SNP government that is shedding its progressive credentials. I urge them to rethink their proposals and work with us to deliver a Housing Bill that transforms housing in Scotland and gives tenants the security, stability and peace of mind that everyone deserves.
READ MORE: John Swinney slams Russell Findlay's 'nerve' in FMQs Budget debate
“Homes should be for living in, not for profiteering.”
Campaign group Living Rent welcomed the assertions the caps will apply in between tenancies, but also hit out at their size.
Its campaign chairwoman Ruth Gilbert said: “Setting a cap at above inflation – even by just 1% – will bake in above-inflation rent increases for tenants, and severely weakens the rent controls we so desperately need.
“We will continue to fight for rent controls that bring out of control rents down, not just limit future increases.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here