A LACK of agreement on funding “significantly contributed” to the Scottish Government’s failure to dual the A9 by 2025, a Holyrood report has found.
The Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee said it remains concerned about whether cash will be made available to meet the new 2035 deadline.
MSPs, who are investigating delays in the project, said issues were repeatedly raised years before the target was scrapped.
READ MORE: Work to dual stretch of A9 to begin this month, Scottish Government confirms
The committee said it is concerned about a lack of open dialogue on the challenges facing the £3 billion project, which will dual the road between Inverness and Perth.
The report warned a lack of transparency could undermine the public’s confidence in Transport Scotland’s ability to deliver major infrastructure projects.
Only 11 miles of the road has been dualled over the past decade, with 77 miles left to go.
The committee is now calling on a duty of candour to be introduced for major projects so challenges are brought to light sooner.
Committee convener Jackson Carlaw said: “The A9 is a key route for the Scottish economy and tourism, but the dualling of the A9 is not just important for Scotland’s economy but for the safety of all those using it.
“Too many people have lost their lives on this road and the thoughts of the committee go out to the families of everyone affected.
“What has become clear to the committee is that a lack of clarity over the availability of funding has, fundamentally, resulted in not just a failure to deliver this project, but it contributed to wider failure to be open about the challenges being faced by the project.
READ MORE: Delayed 2035 completion date for dualling A9 ‘very realistic’, insists minister
“This is, quite frankly, unacceptable for those who live and work in northern Scotland.”
Carlaw said he is “unconvinced” that lessons from the past have been learned following the announcement that construction will be delayed in the Tomatin to Moy section of the road.
He went on: “Our committee is strongly of the view that there must be a duty of candour introduced for major projects such as this to ensure that not only Parliament but also the public are informed about progress.
“We are also calling for proper parliamentary scrutiny through the establishment of a parliamentary committee which could oversee major infrastructure projects.
“This will help to ensure that the people who rely on the A9 are not failed once again.”
Transport Scotland was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel