A SCOTTISH council has sealed proposals for a battery storage system that has some campaigners concerned about a neighbouring Unesco world heritage site.
This summer, the Flow Country of Caithness and Sutherland landed the rare honour of being crowned a “world heritage site”.
That means the 469,500-acre bog system has been deemed a place of “outstanding cultural, historical, or scientific significance”.
But now, the local authority has approved a new battery storage system next to a section of the Flow Country site. The new development will see concrete poured over peatland a stone’s throw from the boundary of the newly-protected area.
READ MORE: Where are Scotland's seven Unesco World Heritage Sites?
It comes as the council recently announced further spending on restoration projects for it.
The site in question is near Mybster and north of the Halsary windfarm, a 20-minute drive west of Wick.
It would be 725m east of Mybster substation.
Battery energy storage systems (BESS) are a new development in the field of renewables which allows excess energy to be stored for short periods.
Directly south of the site is bog that is under restoration, and further south is the boundary of the site recently handed the Unesco recognition.
The area has been earmarked as a potential point of expansion for Unesco, who are looking to grow the site as more bog is restored.
Critics of the energy proposal have pointed out the fire risk and environmental concerns posed by the battery technology.
The proposal was initially delayed in April because of the potential risk to the local area.
Kathrin Haltiner, who lives in Caithness and runs the Highland Renewables Database, objected to the project.
She said: “If the peat was left alone or restored it would really do something for the environment.
“Whereas adding all that concrete, it’s questionable whether that can even be called sustainable in the end.”
READ MORE: Medieval artefacts found in archaeological dig for lost Scottish castle
She is also worried about the fire risk posed by the battery systems, adding: “Everything around it is dried out peat so the chances of it spreading is really considerable.
“All the peat is connected… so the fire would be in the World Heritage Site in no time.”
Councillor Matthew Reiss raised his concerns in the meeting but lost the vote to defer the project.
He said he felt “a stab of disappointment” as other councillors did not share his environmental concerns the site raises.
“It’s progress that has come a price. We should be very careful.”
Councillors are facing an increase in the number of renewable-based planning applications and have warned there is a lack of guidance to support their decision making.
Despite approving the new battery storage site, funding was recently announced supporting peatland restoration projects across the Highlands.
The money going towards the restoration projects has not been revealed but council documents say typical loans can be up to £200,000.
Haltiner added: “It’s quite a strange situation.
“[Highland Council] push for regeneration and protection of the peatland and on the other hand they push for more and more renewable developments.”
Papers sent to the council by developers outlined the measures they would take to reduce any chance of fires.
They say: “Currently foreseeable hazards associated with the equipment have been identified. These hazards are actively managed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel