THE UK Government has announced plans for £1.4 billion of “direct investment” in Scotland over the next 10 years.
The details of the funding, which will bypass Holyrood, were laid out by Scottish Labour on Friday.
Many of the announcements are confirmations of “levelling up” funding, a project begun under the Tories. The UK Government replaced EU funding – which had been controlled by the Scottish Government pre-Brexit – with funding that they directly controlled.
In the Labour manifesto, Keir Starmer’s party pledged to “restore decision-making over the allocation” of those funds “to the representatives of Scotland”. However, they actually moved control to the Scotland Office, rather than restoring it to Holyrood.
READ MORE: Labour's Scotland Office 'to continue Tories' centralisation of power post-Brexit'
Further, many of the other projects laid out on Friday – such as the £20 million “town plans” – had already been announced under the Tory government. However, Labour said that the Conservatives had not allocated any funding, while they now have.
The SNP said that the announcement showed they were “winning the argument” when it comes to the need for greater investment in Scotland.
Labour said that the £1.4bn investment over the next 10 years will come as “in addition to” the increased funding levels for the Scottish Government as a result of the Budget on Wednesday.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s spending plans meant an additional £1.5bn for the SNP Government’s Budget this year, and an extra £3.4bn for 2025/2026.
would “prolong the agony of individuals in our society” – such as the two-child benefit cap.
First Minister John Swinney has welcomed the Budget as “a step in the right direction”, but warned that there were still gaps whichThe projects confirmed to be funded by the UK Government, for a total of £1.38bn, are:
- South Ayrshire – Levelling Up Fund (LUF) Round 3: Levelling Up For Ayrshire: Commercial and Low Carbon Infrastructure: £20,000,000
- Glasgow City – LUF Round 3 Drumchapel Town Centre Regeneration: £14,979,646
- Moray – LUF Round 3 Elgin City Centre Masterplan: Levelling Up Moray: £18,291,00
- North Ayrshire – LUF Round 3 Levelling Up For Ayrshire: Commercial and Low Carbon Infrastructure: £17,456,821
- Dumfries and Galloway – LUF Round 3 Dumfries and Galloway Transport Bid: £13,752,000
- Dumfries and Galloway – LUF Round 3 Three Rivers Active Tourism Project – joint with South Lanarkshire and Scottish Borders: £22,809,416
- South Lanarkshire – LUF Round 3 National Business District: Shawfield – Remediation and Development: £14,637,600
- Shetland – LUF Round 2: Fair Isle Ferry: £26,762,313
- North Ayrshire – LUF Round 1: Infrastructure Improvements on B714: £23,693,443
- Renfrewshire – LUF Round 1: AMIDS South: £38,725,218
- North Ayrshire – Town Plan: Irvine: £20,000,000
- Inverclyde – Town Plan: Greenock: £20,000,000
- East Ayrshire – Town Plan: Kilmarnock: £20,000,000
- North Lanarkshire – Town Plan: Coatbridge: £20,000,000
- West Dunbartonshire – Town Plan: Clydebank: £20,000,000
- Moray – Town Plan: Elgin: £20,000,000
- Dumfries and Galloway – Town Plan: Dumfries: £20,000,000
- Angus – Town Plan: Arbroath: £20,000,000
- Aberdeenshire – Town Plan: Peterhead: £20,000,000
- Orkney – Town Plan: Kirkwall: £20,000,000
- Dundee – Community Renewal Partnership (formerly LUP): £20,250,000
- Scottish Borders – Community Renewal Partnership (formerly LUP): £20,250,000
- Argyll & Bute – Community Renewal Partnership (formerly LUP): £20,250,000
- Western Isles – Community Renewal Partnership (formerly LUP): £20,250,000
- Glasgow City Region – Investment Zone: £160,000,000
- North East Scotland – Investment Zone: £160,000,000
- Highland – Cromarty Green Freeport: £26,000,000
- Falkirk, Fife, Edinburgh – Forth Green Freeport: £26,000,000
- Argyll & Bute – Argyll & Bute Rural Growth Deal: £25,000,000
The UK Government also has £492m in confirmed funding for Scotland "available for all non-full business case approved deal projects", Labour said, bringing the total close to £1.4bn.
MSP Daniel Johnson said: “Labour’s direct investment in these projects will strengthen local communities and economies – but we need a government with ambition in Holyrood too.
“Now Labour has ended austerity, the SNP is out of excuses for its own economic failure – it’s time for change.”
SNP MSP David Torrance said: "It's clear the SNP is winning the argument on the need for more investment in our NHS and public services. We welcome those areas where the Chancellor has listened, including the decision to change the Labour government's conservative fiscal rules to allow for more investment.
READ MORE: Is Scotland being short-changed on funding technicality in the Budget?
"However the Chancellor's decision to cut the Winter Fuel Payment will leave around 900,000 Scottish pensioners up to £600 worse off this winter. The decision to keep the two-child benefit cap and bedroom tax will push thousands of Scottish children into poverty. And the decision to raise National Insurance will hit low and middle income workers, and small businesses, the hardest.
"After 14 years of the Tories, this UK budget should have been the chance to completely turn the page but people in Scotland are still paying the price for Brexit and Westminster cuts, which are wiping billions of pounds from public finances and household incomes."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel