A JOURNALIST has claimed benefits claimants are “parasites” during a TV appearance.
Isabel Oakeshott, journalist and broadcaster and former political editor of the Sunday Times, said the people who benefit from Rachel Reeves’s Budget are the “people who do the least, so basically benefits claimants”.
Appearing on TalkTV on Thursday evening, Oakeshott asked: “How many young people are supposedly too sick to work and being supported by the state?”
READ MORE: Police Scotland staff reject pay offer and warn of strikes
“These figures are absolutely off the chart, and they are completely unjustified.
“By not announcing such a crackdown, Rachel Reeves basically turned this into a Budget of removing resources from those who work in order to keep on sustaining those who, frankly, can't be bothered to get out of bed and get themselves out, whether it's to an office or to any kind of job, and prefer to just sit on the sofa and order their Deliveroo and drive their Motability free vehicle and take everything that the state can offer.
“The state, that is people like you and me and our very many listeners who are grafting just to try to make ends meet.
“Basically these people are, frankly, parasites.”
Oakeshott was condemned by disability equality charity Scope, which said the comments were “utterly disgraceful”.
James Taylor, executive director of strategy and social change at Scope, said: “Isabel Oakeshott’s views on people who claim benefits belong in the past.
READ MORE: Met Office reveals when and where Northern Lights 'may be visible' this weekend
“Calling people ‘parasites’ is utterly disgraceful and fuels a dangerous and damaging narrative that we are today calling out.
“No disabled person who draws on the benefits system is living a life of luxury as Oakeshott claims.
“In fact, for many it’s the complete opposite. Huge numbers of disabled people are unable to afford the basics to have a decent standard of living, even with benefits.
“On top of this many disabled people are pushing hard for jobs.
“Benefits serve a vital function in society. Like the NHS, they are a service that any of us might need to draw on at any time in life.
“Putting an end to the use of harmful language like this helps move us one step further towards an equal future for all.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel