THE UK Government has been condemned by the SNP for the “conscious” and “calculated political decision” to keep children in poverty by refusing to abolish the two-child cap.
Labour MPs voted in July to keep the policy which was introduced by the Conservatives in 2017 as part of a package of severe cuts to the welfare budget.
Labour insisted they remain opposed to the policy in principle but cannot fund the estimated £2.5 billion it would cost to scrap it.
Analysis published before the vote in July found the typical cost of the two-child cap to families in Scotland in 2024 is £287.92 a month, or £3455 a year, for families with three children, and £575.84 a month, or £6910 a year, for families with four children.
READ MORE: Scottish stand-up comedian Janey Godley dies aged 63 after cancer battle
In total, some of the poorest families in Scotland have lost a combined £454.8 million in financial support since the policy was introduced in 2017/18, the data shows.
Speaking at the Scottish Women’s Convention on Saturday, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville, highlighted that by refusing to abolish the two-child cap the UK Government has kept hundreds of thousands of children in poverty.
She said: “The Chancellor’s Budget indicates that there will be a surplus of billions of pounds over a three-year period – but she did not commit a single penny to abolishing the two-child cap.
“The Prime Minister and the Chancellor had the option to lift hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty at the Budget– and they made a conscious, calculated, political decision not to.
“To me, that is unimaginable and unjustifiable.”
The two-child limit restricts the support provided through Tax Credits and Universal Credit to two children per household.
It applies to all families, whether or not they are in work.
The Child Poverty Action Group said last year that the policy was one of the biggest drivers of rising child poverty and that most families affected by it were in work.
While the charity Save the Children calculated last year that scrapping the cap was the “most cost-effective way to reduce child poverty”.
“For the UK Government to have the opportunity and to choose not to use it is an unforgivable betrayal of some of the poorest children in our society,” Somerville added.
“Abolishing the two-child cap would have a transformative impact on hundreds of thousands of children’s lives – and every year that this hated policy continues will push more and more children into poverty.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: “No child should be in poverty – that’s why we’re taking immediate action to help 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a Fair Repayment Rate on Universal Credit deductions.
“Alongside this, we’re extending the Household Support Fund to protect the most vulnerable and delivering on our plan to make work pay as our cross-government Child Poverty Taskforce develops an ambitious strategy to give all children the best start in life.
“The Scottish Government are receiving over 20% more per person than equivalent UK Government spending in the rest of the UK. That translates into over £8.5 billion more in 2025-26.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here