THE family of a “good Samaritan” who was murdered by a man released from prison just one day prior to the killing are seeking damages against a number of Scottish authorities.
Alan Geddes, 56, was murdered by Stuart Quinn in December 2019, after the latter had just been released from prison the day before.
Geddes, a father-of-one, had offered Quinn, who was homeless, a place to stay for the night at his home in Aberdeen after the pair met during an evening out.
Quinn stabbed Geddes 40 times at his home, and in February 2021, he was jailed for a minimum of 18 years for the murder.
It is understood the killer had attempted to enter a homeless unit after he was released from prison, only to find it shut.
Geddes’ relatives are now taking legal action in the court of session against the Scottish Government, NHS Grampian, the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), Aberdeen City Council and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS), on the grounds that they failed to prevent the attack from happening, and for a lack of accountability.
SCTS said the next scheduled hearing on the matter is due to take place over four days, starting May 13 next year.
READ MORE: SNP 'considering' reversing Winter Fuel Payment cut, minister says
Last year, an anonymised report by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland investigated the circumstances leading up to the murder.
It found the killer, referred to in the report as TU, was 32 years old when he had four relatively brief admissions to psychiatric hospital between March and June 2018, and was diagnosed with drug-induced psychosis.
On each admission, TU presented with paranoid delusional beliefs and was detained under the Mental Health Act.
He spent most of 2019 in prison and in December that year, having been on remand, was liberated by the court with no support package in place and no accommodation.
The report said that had he been offered accommodation, this may have reduced the risk to the victim.
It made several other recommendations to the Scottish Government, going forward.
A fatal accident inquiry (FAI) into the murder was never held.
In response to the family’s decision to take legal action, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Our thoughts continue to be with Alan Geddes’ family.
“As this is a live civil case, the Scottish Government cannot comment.”
READ MORE: Partygate was 'overblown', says new Tory leader Kemi Badenoch
An NHS Grampian spokesperson said: “We can confirm legal action has been raised against us. It is being dealt with by the NHS Scotland Central Legal Office.”
Aberdeen City Council said it is unable to comment on ongoing legal proceedings.
An SPS spokesperson said: “Our thoughts remain with the family of Mr Geddes. As this is subject to ongoing proceedings, it would be inappropriate to comment further.”
An SCTS spokesperson said: “We can confirm that a Personal Injuries Summons was received and registered by the Court of Session on December 6, 2022.
“It would not be appropriate for us to comment further on this case ahead of the next scheduled hearing, which is for a four-day proof commencing on May 13, 2025.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here