THE Scotland Office is set for a funding boost – as other Government departments get their budgets slashed, The National can reveal.
The territorial office, headed by Labour’s Ian Murray, is set for a 14% rise in spending, while departments like Transport and the Home Office face the axe.
There is little detail on what the money will be spent on – with the Budget confirming plans for a scheme called Brand Scotland, to promote Scottish produce and industry on the world stage – but The National understands money is allocated for staffing costs and the pressure of inflation.
The Scotland Office spent £13.4 million in the current financial year and is projected to spend £15.4m in the financial year 2025-26, according to Treasury documents with the increase measured in current prices.
The boost comes as other departments face cuts. The Home Office’s budget, spent on policing in England and Wales, will be cut by 2.7% over the next two years and Transport is down by 2.5%, in real terms.
Brand Scotland’s cost makes a £750,000 dent in the £2m uplift planned for the Scotland Office.
On the basis of those figures, it appears widely-reported plans to “turbo-charge” the department, making it into a poverty-fighting force have been shelved.
READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch appoints new shadow Scottish secretary
Before the election, it was reported that the Scotland Office would be transformed into a “spending department” with powers to fund schemes north of the Border directly with a £150m pot of repurposed “Levelling Up” cash.
However, Labour have committed to spending £1.38 billion over the next decade – or £138m annually – on projects in Scotland.
Questions have been raised about how the spending increase will benefit the people of Scotland – with fears raised the money will be spent on “Union-flag-waving projects”.
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie (above) said: “It’s entirely unclear what this money is actually for, and I am sceptical that funding the Scotland Office actually benefits anyone in Scotland.
“Any extra funding for public services or infrastructure should have been devolved to the Scottish Parliament, allowing us to invest it in our schools and NHS or to put it towards scrapping peak rail fares, rolling out free school meals for primary 6 and 7 pupils or mitigating the damage done by Labour’s cruel decision to cut the winter fuel payment.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn joins Westminster's Scottish committee after row over SNP exclusion
“I would love to see this money being used for the benefit of Scotland’s communities, but instead I fear it will be poured into Union-flag-waving projects.”
Chris McEleny (below), the general secretary of the Alba Party, said: “Scotland has its own parliament to make spending commitments on the priorities of the people of Scotland.
"We don’t need an imperial presence to tell us what we should spend our own resources on.”
A UK Government spokesperson said: "The funding settlement agreed for the Scotland Office for this and next financial year ensures a strong department which will play a key role in shaping and influencing UK government policy for Scotland in Westminster and abroad.
"That includes £750k funding for ‘Brand Scotland’, a manifesto commitment that will help drive growth by promoting Scottish services around the world – from shipbuilding to science and salmon to Scotch, along with our rich culture.
"By selling Scotland to the world we can unlock jobs and investment."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel