LEGISLATION that will see Scotland take a fresh approach to emissions targets has been passed at Holyrood.
The Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Bill was passed by 105 votes to zero with seven abstentions at Holyrood from the Scottish Greens.
It amends the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 to introduce limits on the amount of greenhouse gases emitted in Scotland over a five-year period.
The legislation was brought in after ministers were forced to abandon their key target of reducing greenhouse emissions by 75% by 2030.
During the debate on the bill today, the Minister for Climate Action Gillian Martin said it was a source of “great regret” the Scottish Government has not been able to meet this target.
READ MORE: 'Anas Sarwar must tell MPs to vote against English tuition fee hike'
As part of the fresh legislation, Scottish Ministers will need to set carbon budgets so that every year between 2026 and the net-zero emissions target year of 2045 is covered by a budget.
Each carbon budget will cover a period of five years and will set out the amount of greenhouse gas emissions allowed during that period.
The Scottish Government says the move aims to provide a more reliable framework for emissions reduction because the previous annual emissions targets are “vulnerable to year-to-year fluctuations” caused by events such as a particularly cold winter or a global pandemic.
The bill also changes the current deadline to finalise the next Climate Change Plan for Scotland so the plan can align with the process for setting the new carbon budgets.
But backing his party abstaining from the vote, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said the parliament “should be embarrassed” by the need for the bill which he described as an “admission of failure”.
“That failure is largely a result of political choices that have been made,” he said.
“The problem isn’t what’s in the bill, the problem is what’s missing from the bill and that’s urgent climate action.”
After the bill was passed, Imogen Dow, the head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: “The climate humiliation for the Scottish Government is complete.”
Acting Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero Gillian Martin said: “Scotland is now halfway to net zero and continues to be ahead of the UK as a whole in delivering long term emissions reductions.
“The Scottish Government’s commitment to ending Scotland’s contribution to global emissions by 2045 at the latest, as agreed by Parliament on a cross-party basis, is unwavering. It is crucial that our target pathway to 2045 is set at a pace and scale that is feasible and reflects the latest independent expert advice.
READ MORE: CalMac ferry MV Caledonian Isles could be out of action until March
“Carbon budgets are an established model for assessment of emissions reductions used by other nations including Japan, France, England and Wales, and they will include emissions from international aviation and shipping and there will be no provision to “carry over” emissions from one carbon budget to another.
“We will continue leading on climate action that is fair, ambitious and capable of rising to the emergency before us and reflects our commitment to the ambition of credible emissions reduction.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel