TWO councils in Scotland have called on the UK Government to reverse its decision to axe the Winter Fuel Payment for all those not in receipt of benefits.
East Ayshire Council and Perth and Kinross Council both voted to call on Labour to reverse the cut.
Labour voted to make the Winter Fuel Payment means tested in September, leading to warnings from charities about the impact of the cut.
READ MORE: Scottish charity celebrates milestone after donating thousands of bikes to refugees
Age Scotland has warned that nearly 900,000 Scottish pensioners will lose their Winter Fuel Payment, meaning 85% of pensioners will be left in poverty without the vital fund.
On Wednesday, a motion tabled by East Ayrshire SNP councillor Neal Ingram was passed overwhelmingly.
The motion called on the UK Government “to halt the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment at a UK level until an impact assessment can be done and the eligibility for pensions credits can be reviewed”.
Ingram said: “In 2017, the Labour Party, in opposition, argued against the then-Conservative government and its plans to introduce means testing and to link eligibility to pension credit.
“The research the Labour used to argue their case stated that half of all the almost 10,000 decrease in the so-called excess winter deaths between 2000 and 2012 was due to the introduction of the Winter Fuel Allowance.
“They stated that means-testing the Winter Fuel Allowance for pensioners could contribute almost 4000 extra deaths over the winter months.
READ MORE: Scottish university announces 135 jobs at risk amid restructure
“Given their previous position, it is surprising and equally disappointing that one of the first policies Labour introduced is the one they fought so hard against when in opposition.”
The motion was backed by Conservative group leader John McFadzean, while Labour councillor Peter Mabon tabled an amendment highlighting the areas of the Budget that the party says will improve the outlook for older people.
Mabon also called on both the UK and Scottish governments to “revisit” their position on winter fuel payments.
'A disgrace'
It comes after another motion was passed by Perth and Kinross Council on October 30, which also called on the UK Government to reverse its decision to means test the Winter Fuel Payment.
The motion, tabled by Conservative group leader John Duff and the council’s “older people’s champion” Ian Massie, won the support of every elected member except sole Labour councillor Alasdair Bailey.
Bailey, meanwhile, questioned why the Scottish Government had not “exercised its powers to reverse the decision”.
READ MORE: Free Robert Louis Stevenson exhibit opens in Scottish city
He said: “The Scottish Government has various economic and tax levers at its disposal – if it wished to pay the Winter Fuel Allowance, it could.”
Council leader Grant Laing – an SNP councillor – responded: “If Bailey were to support an independent Scotland, we would be able to make all our decisions over funding here.”
Laing, alongside representatives from each political group on the council – with the exception of Labour – are set to write to Chancellor Rachel Reeves expressing their “strong opposition to the means testing of the Winter Fuel Payment and encouraging the Government to reverse this decision”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here