SCOTTISH Labour’s net zero spokesperson missed a key vote on a new climate change bill in Holyrood after flying to Australia.
Sarah Boyack missed the Holyrood debate on Tuesday, as she was 10,000 miles away in Sydney with fellow MSPs Jeremy Balfour and Stuart McMillan, the Daily Record reports.
Holyrood has estimated the cost for the trip is £32,800.
READ MORE: Suspended Labour MP Mike Amesbury charged with assault after late-night incident
MSPs pushed through the legislation on Tuesday after fast tracking it through Parliament. It was passed by 105 votes to zero with seven abstentions.
The bill scrapped annual climate change targets after the SNP Government accepted it could not reduce emissions by 75% by 2030.
We told how it was met with criticism from the Scottish Greens, who abstained from the vote.
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie (below) said the Scottish Government “should be embarrassed” by the need for the bill which he described as an “admission of failure”.
He added: “That failure is largely a result of political choices that have been made,” he said.”
Boyack, a long-standing environmental campaigner and key member of Anas Sarwar’s team, blasted the Scottish Government on the day before the vote.
She said: “This is a day of shame for the SNP Government, whose inaction has left our climate targets in tatters.
“The SNP cannot make the same mistakes again – this bill must be backed up with a real plan to meet our remaining targets and ensure our homes, transport and communities can deliver the just transition we urgently need.”
However, official records show she was absent from the chamber the next day during the debate and did not vote. Boyack and the two other MSPs had earlier flown to the other side of the world to take part in the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) conference.
A Holyrood source told the Daily Record: “Sarah Boyack criticised the Scottish Government’s climate change bill but didn’t even vote because she had flown out to Australia for what some will say is a junket.
READ MORE: John Swinney left 'perplexed' as he tears into 'posturing' Tories at FMQs
“Maybe she needs to take her net zero responsibilities more seriously. It is a poor decision.”
According to Parliament documents, the annual CPA conference started on November 3 and ends on Friday. The event brings together parliamentarians, staff and decision makers from across the Commonwealth for a “unique conference and networking opportunity”.
This year’s gathering includes workshops, a “world café” and a general assembly debate.
The document stated: “Six members applied for the opportunity and Sarah Boyack MSP was selected by the Branch Executive Committee as the successful candidate.”
Flights were paid for by the CPA, but the remaining costs for travel, accommodation, registration fees, meals and “appropriate incidental expenses” will be paid by Holyrood.
In 2022, Boyack aimed a dig at SNP Cabinet Secretary Angus Robertson for travelling abroad.
"While Angus Robertson racks up air miles talking about Scotland's fantastic culture sector abroad, businesses at home are facing a perfect storm,” she said at the time.
A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: “Sarah Boyack attended the annual conference of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association on behalf of the Scottish Parliament as part of a cross-party delegation with Stuart McMillan and Jeremy Balfour.
“This trip was agreed by the Scottish Parliament before the timetable for the bill was set.
“The conference has included discussions on the impact of the climate emergency on countries like Scotland and has been an opportunity to share international best practice on issues such as clean power, housing, and job creation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel