LABOUR saw off their rivals and held on to their Gourock council seat as their candidate came out on top in the Inverclyde West by-election.
Ian Hellyer became Inverclyde West’s newest councillor after seeing off his SNP, Conservative, Alba and Reform UK rivals in Thursday's poll.
Hellyer secured 932 first-preference votes, with the SNP's Robert Kirkpatrick on 923, Ted Runciman for the Conservatives on 415, Alba Party candidate Chris McEleny on 239, and John Burleigh for Reform UK on 230.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories take three seats from SNP in by-elections
Under the proportional voting system used in council elections, Hellyer was elected at stage five of the counting process.
His win means Labour have held on to the council seat which was previously vacated by Labour’s Martin McCluskey earlier this year following his election as Inverclyde’s MP.
Labour now hold eight seats on Inverclyde Council, two more than their nearest rivals the SNP, whose tally was reduced from eight to six in recent months due to councillors Kirsty Law and Innes Nelson quitting the party.
Councillor Hellyer announced his candidacy at the start of October, vowing be a voice for Gourock residents, invest in the town’s coastline and green spaces and work to regenerate Shore Street.
The father-of-three also said he would like to see a more visible community policing presence in the area.
The 65-year-old served for 30 years in Strathclyde Police with 12 of those spent in community policing in Gourock, before becoming a local driving instructor and examiner.
Speaking to the Greenock Telegraph last month, councillor Hellyer said Gourock had always been a "big part" of his life and was full of praise for the town.
His campaign to become Gourock’s newest councillor received backing from Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who made several visits to the town throughout the by-election campaign to show his support for the candidate.
Councillor Hellyer joins SNP politician Sandra Reynolds and independent councillor Lynne Quinn as an Inverclyde West elected member.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel